Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Resolving the Kohayakawa-Kreuter Conjecture for Families

Matthew Yancey

Abstract

A graph $G$ is $(a,b)$-sparse if every nonempty subgraph $H$ satisfies $e(H) \leq a v(H) - b$. We are interested in the conditions under which an $(a,b)$-sparse graph can be partitioned $E(G) = E(G_1) \cup E(G_2)$ such that for $i \in \{1,2\}$ we have that $G_i$ is $(a_i, b_i)$-sparse. Kuperwasser, Samotij, and Wigderson conjectured that a $(m,0)$-sparse graph can be partitioned into a $(1,1)$-sparse graph and a $(m,2m-1)$-sparse graph. We prove the conjecture in full. The Kohayakawa-Kreuter Conjecture for Families claims that $n^{-1/m_2}$ is the threshold function for the random graph being Ramsey a.a.s. for graph families $\mathcal{H}_1, \ldots \mathcal{H}_r$. Kuperwasser, Samotij, and Wigderson motivated their conjecture by proving that it is sufficient to establish the Kohayakawa-Kreuter Conjecture for Families.

Resolving the Kohayakawa-Kreuter Conjecture for Families

Abstract

A graph is -sparse if every nonempty subgraph satisfies . We are interested in the conditions under which an -sparse graph can be partitioned such that for we have that is -sparse. Kuperwasser, Samotij, and Wigderson conjectured that a -sparse graph can be partitioned into a -sparse graph and a -sparse graph. We prove the conjecture in full. The Kohayakawa-Kreuter Conjecture for Families claims that is the threshold function for the random graph being Ramsey a.a.s. for graph families . Kuperwasser, Samotij, and Wigderson motivated their conjecture by proving that it is sufficient to establish the Kohayakawa-Kreuter Conjecture for Families.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 9 theorems, 13 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 9 theorems, 13 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1.1

For $k \in \mathbb{Z}_+$, a graph that is $(k, 0)$-sparse can be partitioned into a $(1,1)$-sparse and a $(k, 2k-1)$-sparse graph.

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Lemma 1.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Remark 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 8 more