Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Manipulating Charge Distribution in Moiré Superlattices by Light

Ruiping Guo, Haowei Chen, Wenhui Duan, Yong Xu, Chong Wang

Abstract

In ordinary solids, nonlinear optical responses are typically studied in terms of unit-cell averages due to the angström-scale lattice constants. In contrast, moiré superlattices, characterized by a large length scale, unlock an often-overlooked degree of freedom: intra-supercell spatial variations of local observables. Here, we formulate the second-order direct current (DC) charge response in a spatially resolved manner, showing that even uniform optical illumination can drive a static, spatially non-uniform charge redistribution within a supercell. This effect is ubiquitous and cannot be forbidden by any crystalline symmetries. Furthermore, we identify a dominant contribution arising from diverging analytical response coefficients, which leads to linear-in-time growth of the redistribution in the absence of relaxation. This growth is driven by the convergence or divergence of local DC photocurrents. Applying our theory to twisted bilayer MoTe$_2$, we demonstrate strong, highly tunable charge modulation controlled by light intensity and frequency, opening a route to in situ, all-optical control of moiré-periodic electrostatic potentials. Our work underscores the importance of intra-cell degrees of freedom, which enable a qualitatively richer class of nonlinear optical responses in moiré superlattices.

Manipulating Charge Distribution in Moiré Superlattices by Light

Abstract

In ordinary solids, nonlinear optical responses are typically studied in terms of unit-cell averages due to the angström-scale lattice constants. In contrast, moiré superlattices, characterized by a large length scale, unlock an often-overlooked degree of freedom: intra-supercell spatial variations of local observables. Here, we formulate the second-order direct current (DC) charge response in a spatially resolved manner, showing that even uniform optical illumination can drive a static, spatially non-uniform charge redistribution within a supercell. This effect is ubiquitous and cannot be forbidden by any crystalline symmetries. Furthermore, we identify a dominant contribution arising from diverging analytical response coefficients, which leads to linear-in-time growth of the redistribution in the absence of relaxation. This growth is driven by the convergence or divergence of local DC photocurrents. Applying our theory to twisted bilayer MoTe, we demonstrate strong, highly tunable charge modulation controlled by light intensity and frequency, opening a route to in situ, all-optical control of moiré-periodic electrostatic potentials. Our work underscores the importance of intra-cell degrees of freedom, which enable a qualitatively richer class of nonlinear optical responses in moiré superlattices.
Paper Structure (7 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 7 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of a moiré supercell under uniform optical illumination, showing in-plane, non-uniform DC photocurrents (green arrows) converging toward the cell center. Red and blue colors mark regions of positive and negative charge accumulation resulting from photocurrent convergence and divergence.
  • Figure 2: (a) Band structure of $\text{tMoTe}_{\text{2}}$ at twist angle $\theta=1.0^\circ$. The $\pm \mathbf{K}$ valley degrees of freedom, inherited from monolayer $\text{MoTe}_{\text{2}}$, remain decoupled. Blue solid and red dashed lines are bands from the $+\mathbf{K}$ and $-\mathbf{K}$ valleys, respectively. The band gap is $1.057$ eV. (b) Brillouin zones of the top (solid gray), bottom (dashed gray) monolayer MoTe$_2$, and the moiré Brillouin zone of tMoTe$_2$ (black). (c) Enlarged moiré Brillouin zone, showing high-symmetry points and six reciprocal lattice vectors ($\mathbf{G}_{1-6}$) with the smallest magnitude.
  • Figure 3: Frequency dependence of $\zeta^{xx}(\mathbf{G}_2; \omega_0)$. Real and imaginary parts are shown in the top and bottom subplots, respectively. Here, $\zeta_0 \approx 1.602\times 10^{-19} \, \mathrm{C}^3/\mathrm{J}^2$. The full charge response [Eq. (\ref{['eq:zeta']})] is shown as solid green lines; the accumulation-only contribution [Eq. (\ref{['eq:zeta_inj']})] is indicated by dashed orange lines. Vertical dotted lines mark the band gap energy at $\hbar \omega_0 \approx 1.057~\text{eV}$
  • Figure 4: Real-space charge redistribution in $\text{tMoTe}_{\text{2}}$ under linearly polarized illumination. (a,b) Photoinduced charge density $\Delta\rho(\mathbf{r})$ under $x$-polarized light at photon energies $\hbar \omega_0 = 1.104 \, \mathrm{eV}$ and $1.122 \, \mathrm{eV}$, respectively, with fixed intensity $1.0\times 10^{11} \, \mathrm{W/m^2}$. The dashed parallelogram in (a) outlines a moiré supercell, with high-symmetry stacking sites MM, XM, and MX marked by black, blue, and green dots. (c,d) Moiré-periodic electrostatic potentials $U(\mathbf{r})$ induced in a nearby layered material, computed from the charge distributions in (a,b), respectively. (e) Comparison between the charge response coefficient $2\eta\,\zeta^{xx}(\mathbf{G}_2; \omega_0)$ computed directly (solid pink) and inferred from the continuity equation [Eq. (\ref{['eq:CE_coef']})] via the corresponding photocurrent (cyan dots). (f) Spatial distribution of the DC photocurrent (black arrows) and time derivative $\partial_t \Delta\rho$ (color map) under the same conditions as in (b), within a single moiré supercell.