Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Nature of $K^*(1680)$ and $q\bar{q}$-hybrid mixing as the SU(3) partner of $η_{1}(1855)$ in the strange sector

Samee Ullah, Ye Cao, Ming-Xiao Duan, Hai-Bing Fu, Qiang Zhao

Abstract

We presents an investigation of the $K^*(1680)$ state in its strong decays into two-body finial states within the flux-tube model and quark pair creation model. Since the charge conjugation parity is not conserved in the strange sector, the conventional $q\bar{q}$ states of $J^{P(C)}=1^{-(-)}$ can mix with the lowest hybrid states with $J^{P(C)}=1^{-(+)}$. Our analysis of the $K^*(1680)$ two-body strong decays indicates that the decay pattern of $K^*(1680)$ cannot be explained by the conventional $q\bar{q}$ scenario. Meanwhile, strong evidence shows the $q\bar{q}$-hybrid mixing mechanism in the strange sector. The phenomenological consequences of such a mixing are also discussed. Our study can provide a guidance for the future search for hybrid multiplets in experiment at BESIII, LHCb, and Belle-II.

Nature of $K^*(1680)$ and $q\bar{q}$-hybrid mixing as the SU(3) partner of $η_{1}(1855)$ in the strange sector

Abstract

We presents an investigation of the state in its strong decays into two-body finial states within the flux-tube model and quark pair creation model. Since the charge conjugation parity is not conserved in the strange sector, the conventional states of can mix with the lowest hybrid states with . Our analysis of the two-body strong decays indicates that the decay pattern of cannot be explained by the conventional scenario. Meanwhile, strong evidence shows the -hybrid mixing mechanism in the strange sector. The phenomenological consequences of such a mixing are also discussed. Our study can provide a guidance for the future search for hybrid multiplets in experiment at BESIII, LHCb, and Belle-II.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 24 equations, 3 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 7 sections, 24 equations, 3 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Schematic illustrations for the two-body hadronic decays of hybrid states. (a) is dominated by the collinear mode, and (b) is dominated by the transverse mode.
  • Figure 2: Illustrations of the strong decays of $K^*(1680)$ as a $q\bar{q}$ into $PP$ or $PV$ in the QPC model. The collinear mode of a hybrid decay via Fig. \ref{['Fig:FT']} (a) cannot be distinguished from the QPC mechanism shown here.
  • Figure 3: (a) The fitted mixing angle $\zeta$ for different $\gamma_2$ values: $\gamma_2=5,\ 6,\ 7,\ 8,$ and $9$ with $\delta=1.2$. (b) Partial decay widths for the four decay modes $K\pi$, $K\eta$, $K^*\pi$, and $K\rho$ are fitted by the mixing angle $\zeta$ with $\gamma_2=5,\ 6,\ 7,\ 8$, and $9$ and $\delta=1.2$.