Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Collapse and transition of a superposition of states under a delta-function pulse in a two-level system

Ariel Edery

Abstract

Under a time-dependent perturbation it is common to calculate the transition probability in going from from one eigenstate to another eigenstate of a quantum system. In this work we study the transition in going from a \textit{linear superposition of eigenstates} to an eigenstate under a delta-function pulse (which acts at $t=0$). We consider a two-level system with energy levels $E_1$ and $E_2$ and solve the coupled set of first order equations to obtain exact analytical expressions for the coefficients $c_1(t>0)$ and $c_2(t>0)$ of the final state. The expressions for the final coefficients are general in the sense that they are functions of the interaction strength $β$ and the coefficients $α_1$ and $α_2$ of the initial superposition state which are free parameters constrained only by $|α_1|^2+ |α_2|^2=1$. This opens up new possibilities and in particular, allows for a ``collapse" scenario. We obtain a general analytical expression for the transition probability $P_{α_1,α_2 \to 2}$ in going from an initial superposition state to the second eigenstate. Armed with this general expression we study some interesting special cases. With a delta-function pulse, the transitions are abrupt/instantaneous and we show that they do not depend on the energy gap $E_2-E_1$ and hence on the relative phase between the two eigenstates. For specific multiple values of the interaction strength $β$, we show that the system ends up in a definite eigenstate i.e. probability of unity. Such a transition can be viewed as a ``collapse" since a superposition of states transitions abruptly to a definite eigenstate. The collapse of the wavefunction is familiar in the context of a measurement. Here it occurs via a delta-function pulse in Schrödinger's equation. We discuss how this differs from a collapse due to a measurement.

Collapse and transition of a superposition of states under a delta-function pulse in a two-level system

Abstract

Under a time-dependent perturbation it is common to calculate the transition probability in going from from one eigenstate to another eigenstate of a quantum system. In this work we study the transition in going from a \textit{linear superposition of eigenstates} to an eigenstate under a delta-function pulse (which acts at ). We consider a two-level system with energy levels and and solve the coupled set of first order equations to obtain exact analytical expressions for the coefficients and of the final state. The expressions for the final coefficients are general in the sense that they are functions of the interaction strength and the coefficients and of the initial superposition state which are free parameters constrained only by . This opens up new possibilities and in particular, allows for a ``collapse" scenario. We obtain a general analytical expression for the transition probability in going from an initial superposition state to the second eigenstate. Armed with this general expression we study some interesting special cases. With a delta-function pulse, the transitions are abrupt/instantaneous and we show that they do not depend on the energy gap and hence on the relative phase between the two eigenstates. For specific multiple values of the interaction strength , we show that the system ends up in a definite eigenstate i.e. probability of unity. Such a transition can be viewed as a ``collapse" since a superposition of states transitions abruptly to a definite eigenstate. The collapse of the wavefunction is familiar in the context of a measurement. Here it occurs via a delta-function pulse in Schrödinger's equation. We discuss how this differs from a collapse due to a measurement.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 66 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 8 sections, 66 equations, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Plot of $|k|=|\beta|/\hbar$ vs. $|\alpha_1|$. The are two plots corresponding to the two signs in (\ref{['ModBeta']}). The solid line plot corresponds to the positive sign and runs from $\pi/2$ to $0$ whereas the dashed plot corresponds to the negative sign and runs from $\pi/2$ to $\pi$.