Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Topological Causal Effects

Kwangho Kim, Hajin Lee

Abstract

Estimating causal effects is particularly challenging when outcomes arise in complex, non-Euclidean spaces, where conventional methods often fail to capture meaningful structural variation. We develop a framework for topological causal inference that defines treatment effects through differences in the topological structure of potential outcomes, summarized by power-weighted silhouette functions of persistence diagrams. We develop an efficient, doubly robust estimator in a fully nonparametric model, establish functional weak convergence, and construct a formal test of the null hypothesis of no topological effect. Empirical studies illustrate that the proposed method reliably quantifies topological treatment effects across diverse complex outcome types.

Topological Causal Effects

Abstract

Estimating causal effects is particularly challenging when outcomes arise in complex, non-Euclidean spaces, where conventional methods often fail to capture meaningful structural variation. We develop a framework for topological causal inference that defines treatment effects through differences in the topological structure of potential outcomes, summarized by power-weighted silhouette functions of persistence diagrams. We develop an efficient, doubly robust estimator in a fully nonparametric model, establish functional weak convergence, and construct a formal test of the null hypothesis of no topological effect. Empirical studies illustrate that the proposed method reliably quantifies topological treatment effects across diverse complex outcome types.
Paper Structure (27 sections, 8 theorems, 109 equations, 12 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 27 sections, 8 theorems, 109 equations, 12 figures, 3 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

For any $\delta>0$, and hence

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Left: Example of untreated vs. treated macromolecule structures. Right: Corresponding persistence diagrams, highlighting treatment-induced changes in the 1st-order homology features.
  • Figure 2: Silhouette functions revealing differences in $1$-dimensional features in the ORBIT dataset adams2017persistence. (a) Point clouds $A,B,C,D$; (b) their power-weighted silhouettes; (c) silhouette contrasts $\phi_A-\phi_B$ (top) and $\phi_C-\phi_D$ (bottom). Strong signals in $\phi_A-\phi_B$ indicate new $1$-dimensional features in $A$ relative to $B$, whereas near-zero $\phi_C-\phi_D$ shows little change between $C$ and $D$.
  • Figure 3: (a) CT-scan images of non-infected (top) and infected (bottom) patients; (b) corresponding 0-dimensional persistence diagrams; (c) average silhouettes of non-infected and infected patients given $r=0.1$ (top) and difference in average silhouettes between non-infected and infected patients.
  • Figure 4: The true silhouette function and its PI, IPW, AIPW estimates. (a) 0-dimensional silhouettes computed from the SARS-CoV-2 dataset, (b) 0-dimensional silhouettes computed from the GEOM-Drugs dataset, and (c) 1-dimensional silhouettes computed from the GEOM-Drugs dataset.
  • Figure 5: Visualization of the point-wise mean (dotted line) and the point-wise 1-standard deviation error bands (shaded area) of PI, IPW, and AIPW estimators on the SARS-CoV-2 dataset. The true topological causal effect is shown as a blue line.
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (22)

  • Lemma 2.1: Lipschitz stability of the weighted silhouette
  • Remark 1: Choice of $r$
  • Remark 2: Sample splitting
  • Theorem 5.1
  • Example 5.1: Functional linear smoother
  • Theorem 5.2
  • Theorem 5.3
  • Corollary 5.4
  • proof
  • proof
  • ...and 12 more