Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Growth factor in teleparallel Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Shivam Kumar Mishra, Jackson Levi Said, B. Mishra

Abstract

Teleparallel gravity offers a competing geometric framework on which to build cosmological models. The Gauss-Bonnet invariant captures key aspects of the underlying geometry that has been shown to be an interesting way to form cosmological models beyond $Λ$CDM cosmology. In this work, we explore three competing cosmological models in $F(T,T_G)$ cosmology in the context of their evolution of the growth of structure in the Universe. This is a core test of the viability of any cosmological model. In our work, we show how these models are qualitatively competitive with $Λ$CDM cosmology for certain ranges of model parameters. Interestingly, the models can arrive at the same level of growth as $Λ$CDM while producing possible deviations at intermediate scales.

Growth factor in teleparallel Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Abstract

Teleparallel gravity offers a competing geometric framework on which to build cosmological models. The Gauss-Bonnet invariant captures key aspects of the underlying geometry that has been shown to be an interesting way to form cosmological models beyond CDM cosmology. In this work, we explore three competing cosmological models in cosmology in the context of their evolution of the growth of structure in the Universe. This is a core test of the viability of any cosmological model. In our work, we show how these models are qualitatively competitive with CDM cosmology for certain ranges of model parameters. Interestingly, the models can arrive at the same level of growth as CDM while producing possible deviations at intermediate scales.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 66 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 14 sections, 66 equations, 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Growth factor evolution for model A. The bold line represents the growth factor for $\Lambda CDM$. The dotted-dashed, dashed, and thick dashed lines represent the growth factor for model A at parameter values $p_1=0.001$, $p_1=0.01$, and $p_1=0.0003$, respectively. We see that the model deviates from $\Lambda CDM$ for all values of $p_1$.
  • Figure 2: Growth factor evolution for model B. The solid curve corresponds to the $\Lambda$CDM growth factor, while the dashed-dotted curve denotes the growth factor for model B evaluated at $c_{22}=1.7$. The results indicate that the model closely tracks $\Lambda$CDM.
  • Figure 3: Growth factor evolution for model C. The solid curve represents the $\Lambda$CDM growth factor, while the dashed-dotted curve corresponds to the growth factor for model C evaluated at $p_3=0.05$. The results show that the model exhibits only minimal deviations from the $\Lambda$CDM prediction.