Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Adaptive Estimation and Inference in Conditional Moment Models via the Discrepancy Principle

Jiyuan Tan, Vasilis Syrgkanis

TL;DR

A discrepancy-principle-based framework for adaptive hyperparameter selection that automatically balances bias and variance without relying on the unknown smoothness parameter is introduced, providing a practical, theoretically grounded approach for adaptive inference in ill-posed econometric models.

Abstract

We study adaptive estimation and inference in ill-posed linear inverse problems defined by conditional moment restrictions. Existing regularized estimators such as Regularized DeepIV (RDIV) require prior knowledge of the smoothness of the nuisance function, typically encoded by a beta source condition to tune their regularization parameters. In practice, this smoothness is unknown, and misspecified hyperparameters can lead to suboptimal convergence or instability. We introduce a discrepancy-principle-based framework for adaptive hyperparameter selection that automatically balances bias and variance without relying on the unknown smoothness parameter. Our framework applies to both RDIV (Li et al. [2024]) and the Tikhonov Regularized Adversarial Estimator (TRAE) (Bennett et al. [2023a]) and achieves the same rates in both weak and strong metrics. Building on this, we construct a fully adaptive doubly robust estimator for linear functionals that attains the optimal rate of the better-conditioned primal or dual problem, providing a practical, theoretically grounded approach for adaptive inference in ill-posed econometric models.

Adaptive Estimation and Inference in Conditional Moment Models via the Discrepancy Principle

TL;DR

A discrepancy-principle-based framework for adaptive hyperparameter selection that automatically balances bias and variance without relying on the unknown smoothness parameter is introduced, providing a practical, theoretically grounded approach for adaptive inference in ill-posed econometric models.

Abstract

We study adaptive estimation and inference in ill-posed linear inverse problems defined by conditional moment restrictions. Existing regularized estimators such as Regularized DeepIV (RDIV) require prior knowledge of the smoothness of the nuisance function, typically encoded by a beta source condition to tune their regularization parameters. In practice, this smoothness is unknown, and misspecified hyperparameters can lead to suboptimal convergence or instability. We introduce a discrepancy-principle-based framework for adaptive hyperparameter selection that automatically balances bias and variance without relying on the unknown smoothness parameter. Our framework applies to both RDIV (Li et al. [2024]) and the Tikhonov Regularized Adversarial Estimator (TRAE) (Bennett et al. [2023a]) and achieves the same rates in both weak and strong metrics. Building on this, we construct a fully adaptive doubly robust estimator for linear functionals that attains the optimal rate of the better-conditioned primal or dual problem, providing a practical, theoretically grounded approach for adaptive inference in ill-posed econometric models.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 20 theorems, 162 equations, 3 figures, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 17 sections, 20 theorems, 162 equations, 3 figures, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Proposition 3.4

Suppose that Assumptions asp:range, asp:source_condition, asp:closeness_deepiv, asp:re_cd, and asp:cr_deepiv hold. Then, there exist sufficiently large constants $c_d, N > 0$ such that for all $n > N$, the output of alg:discrepancy---given inputs $\lambda_0 = 2$ and $\delta = c_d \delta_n$, where $\

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Mean absolute error of the DeepIV estimator using different regularization parameters. Each experiment is repeated 50 times.
  • Figure 2: (a) Mean absolute error of the TRAE primal estimator using different regularization parameters.
  • Figure 3: (b) Mean absolute error of the TRAE double robust estimator using different regularization parameters.

Theorems & Definitions (22)

  • Definition 2.2: Discrepancy Principle
  • Proposition 3.4
  • Theorem 3.5
  • Lemma 3.6
  • Lemma 3.7
  • Remark 3.8
  • Proposition 3.12
  • Theorem 3.13
  • Corollary 3.14
  • Lemma A.1
  • ...and 12 more