Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Intent-Context Synergy Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous UAV Decision-Making in Air Combat

Jiahao Fu, Feng Yang

TL;DR

The proposed Intent-Context Synergy Reinforcement Learning framework achieves a mission success rate of 88\% and reduces the average exposure frequency to 0.24 per episode, validating its superiority in ensuring robust and stealthy penetration in high-dynamic scenarios.

Abstract

Autonomous UAV infiltration in dynamic contested environments remains a significant challenge due to the partially observable nature of threats and the conflicting objectives of mission efficiency versus survivability. Traditional Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches often suffer from myopic decision-making and struggle to balance these trade-offs in real-time. To address these limitations, this paper proposes an Intent-Context Synergy Reinforcement Learning (ICS-RL) framework. The framework introduces two core innovations: (1) An LSTM-based Intent Prediction Module that forecasts the future trajectories of hostile units, transforming the decision paradigm from reactive avoidance to proactive planning via state augmentation; (2) A Context-Analysis Synergy Mechanism that decomposes the mission into hierarchical sub-tasks (safe cruise, stealth planning, and hostile breakthrough). We design a heterogeneous ensemble of Dueling DQN agents, each specialized in a specific tactical context. A dynamic switching controller based on Max-Advantage values seamlessly integrates these agents, allowing the UAV to adaptively select the optimal policy without hard-coded rules. Extensive simulations demonstrate that ICS-RL significantly outperforms baselines (Standard DDQN) and traditional methods (PSO, Game Theory). The proposed method achieves a mission success rate of 88\% and reduces the average exposure frequency to 0.24 per episode, validating its superiority in ensuring robust and stealthy penetration in high-dynamic scenarios.

Intent-Context Synergy Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous UAV Decision-Making in Air Combat

TL;DR

The proposed Intent-Context Synergy Reinforcement Learning framework achieves a mission success rate of 88\% and reduces the average exposure frequency to 0.24 per episode, validating its superiority in ensuring robust and stealthy penetration in high-dynamic scenarios.

Abstract

Autonomous UAV infiltration in dynamic contested environments remains a significant challenge due to the partially observable nature of threats and the conflicting objectives of mission efficiency versus survivability. Traditional Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches often suffer from myopic decision-making and struggle to balance these trade-offs in real-time. To address these limitations, this paper proposes an Intent-Context Synergy Reinforcement Learning (ICS-RL) framework. The framework introduces two core innovations: (1) An LSTM-based Intent Prediction Module that forecasts the future trajectories of hostile units, transforming the decision paradigm from reactive avoidance to proactive planning via state augmentation; (2) A Context-Analysis Synergy Mechanism that decomposes the mission into hierarchical sub-tasks (safe cruise, stealth planning, and hostile breakthrough). We design a heterogeneous ensemble of Dueling DQN agents, each specialized in a specific tactical context. A dynamic switching controller based on Max-Advantage values seamlessly integrates these agents, allowing the UAV to adaptively select the optimal policy without hard-coded rules. Extensive simulations demonstrate that ICS-RL significantly outperforms baselines (Standard DDQN) and traditional methods (PSO, Game Theory). The proposed method achieves a mission success rate of 88\% and reduces the average exposure frequency to 0.24 per episode, validating its superiority in ensuring robust and stealthy penetration in high-dynamic scenarios.
Paper Structure (33 sections, 24 equations, 10 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 33 sections, 24 equations, 10 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: Mission Scenario Diagram.
  • Figure 2: UAV Kinematics model.
  • Figure 3: Fundamental framework of reinforcement learning.
  • Figure 4: The structure diagram of air combat decision model.
  • Figure 5: Comparison of cumulative reward curves between CA-DDQN and Standard DDQN.
  • ...and 5 more figures