Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Joint Analysis of Sensitivity to Anticipation and Parallel Trends Violations

Gianna Fenaroli

Abstract

Two key identifying assumptions used to justify difference-in-differences are parallel trends and no anticipation, yet both may fail in practice. I propose a class of assumptions on anticipation and derive closed-form, sharp bounds on the average treatment effect on the treated while simultaneously relaxing parallel trends. Deviations from both assumptions are jointly disciplined using observed pre-trends. When some anticipation is imposed, the identified set under joint deviations can be shorter than under parallel trends violations alone. These bounds inform a sensitivity analysis assessing the robustness of qualitative conclusions to anticipation and parallel trends violations. I illustrate with an empirical application.

A Joint Analysis of Sensitivity to Anticipation and Parallel Trends Violations

Abstract

Two key identifying assumptions used to justify difference-in-differences are parallel trends and no anticipation, yet both may fail in practice. I propose a class of assumptions on anticipation and derive closed-form, sharp bounds on the average treatment effect on the treated while simultaneously relaxing parallel trends. Deviations from both assumptions are jointly disciplined using observed pre-trends. When some anticipation is imposed, the identified set under joint deviations can be shorter than under parallel trends violations alone. These bounds inform a sensitivity analysis assessing the robustness of qualitative conclusions to anticipation and parallel trends violations. I illustrate with an empirical application.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 6 theorems, 42 equations, 4 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 19 sections, 6 theorems, 42 equations, 4 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Lemma 1

A general expression for the $\text{ATT}_{1}$ in terms of anticipation effects $(\varphi_0)$ and post-treatment parallel trends violations $(\delta_1)$ is

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Estimated Breakdown Frontiers for $\text{ATT}_{2008} < 0$ with Fixed $\overline{p}$
  • Figure 2: Estimated Breakdown Frontier for $\text{ATT}_{2008} < 0$ - Singleton Cases
  • Figure 3: Estimated Identified Sets for the $\text{ATT}_{2008}$
  • Figure 4: Estimated Breakdown Frontier for $\text{ATT}_{2008} > -0.1$ and Identified Sets

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Lemma 1
  • Corollary 1
  • Corollary 2
  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 3
  • Theorem 2
  • Remark 1