Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Bounds on $R_0$ and final epidemic size when the next-generation matrix $M$ is only partially known

Andrea Bizzotto, Frank Ball, Tom Britton

Abstract

We study a multitype SIR epidemic model where individuals are categorized into different types, and where infection spread is characterized by a next-generation matrix $M=\{m_{ij}\}$ with community fractions $\{π_j\}$ for the different types of individuals. We analyse two key quantities: the basic reproduction number $R_0$ and the final epidemic outcome of the different types $\{τ_i\}$. We consider the situation where $M$ is only partly known, through the row sums $\{r_i\}$ or the column sums $\{c_j\}$, and treat both a general $M$ and the special but common situation where $M$ is proportional to a contact matrix satisfying detailed balance. For a general $M$, which is partially observed through $\{r_i\}$ or $\{c_j\}$, we obtain sharp upper and lower bounds of $R_0$ and $\{τ_i\}$, but for the case where $M$ satisfies detailed balance the problem is harder: our obtained bounds for $R_0$ are narrower than the general case but still not sharp, and bounds for the final size are only obtained when there are two types of individual.

Bounds on $R_0$ and final epidemic size when the next-generation matrix $M$ is only partially known

Abstract

We study a multitype SIR epidemic model where individuals are categorized into different types, and where infection spread is characterized by a next-generation matrix with community fractions for the different types of individuals. We analyse two key quantities: the basic reproduction number and the final epidemic outcome of the different types . We consider the situation where is only partly known, through the row sums or the column sums , and treat both a general and the special but common situation where is proportional to a contact matrix satisfying detailed balance. For a general , which is partially observed through or , we obtain sharp upper and lower bounds of and , but for the case where satisfies detailed balance the problem is harder: our obtained bounds for are narrower than the general case but still not sharp, and bounds for the final size are only obtained when there are two types of individual.
Paper Structure (26 sections, 15 theorems, 242 equations, 3 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 26 sections, 15 theorems, 242 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Depending on whether row or columns sums of $M$ are known, the sharp bounds on $R_0$ are given by Further, if both the row and column sums are known, then These bounds are not necessarily sharp.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Plots showing regions in the $(r_1,r_2)$ plane of different behaviours of $\bar{\tau}(\theta)$ for different values of $\pi_1$. The solid red curve is $\hat{r}_2(r_1)$ and the blue curve is $\tilde{r}_2(r_1)$. The green line is $r_2=r_1$. Recall that $\bar{\tau}(\theta)$ is identically zero if $r_2 \le 1$ and the analysis assumes $r_2>r_1$.
  • Figure 2: Plots showing lower and upper bounds for $R_0$ and $\bar{\tau}$, both under generic $M$ and under detailed balance restriction, knowing only the row sums, when there are $k=2$ types of individuals, $\pi_1=0.2$ and $r_1=1.6$.
  • Figure 3: Different bounds for $R_0$ and the final size $\bar{\tau}$ in the Belgian study taking heterogeneity within age-groups into account.

Theorems & Definitions (38)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • Theorem 3.3: Known column sums
  • Remark 3.1
  • Theorem 3.4: Known row sums
  • Remark 3.2
  • Theorem 3.5: Known row sums
  • Remark 3.3
  • Remark 3.4
  • Remark 3.5
  • ...and 28 more