Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Nonequilibrium topological response under charge dephasing

Shuangyuan Lu, Lucas Q Silveira, Yizhi You

Abstract

We explore nonequilibrium topological responses of symmetry-protected topological (SPT) states in open quantum systems subject to decoherence. For SPT wavefunctions protected by a product symmetry G $\times$ S , where G defects are decorated with S charge, we show that local dephasing of the S charge density generically induces spontaneous strong-to-weak symmetry breaking (SWSSB) of G in the resulting mixed-state ensemble. We extend this mechanism to SPT phases protected by higher-form and spatially modulated symmetries, and further to gapless SPT states, demonstrating that dephasing-induced SWSSB persists well beyond conventional gapped 0-form settings. Our results provide a qualitative, channel-defined fingerprint of SPT order that is intrinsic to open-system dynamics and goes beyond equilibrium linear response.

Nonequilibrium topological response under charge dephasing

Abstract

We explore nonequilibrium topological responses of symmetry-protected topological (SPT) states in open quantum systems subject to decoherence. For SPT wavefunctions protected by a product symmetry G S , where G defects are decorated with S charge, we show that local dephasing of the S charge density generically induces spontaneous strong-to-weak symmetry breaking (SWSSB) of G in the resulting mixed-state ensemble. We extend this mechanism to SPT phases protected by higher-form and spatially modulated symmetries, and further to gapless SPT states, demonstrating that dephasing-induced SWSSB persists well beyond conventional gapped 0-form settings. Our results provide a qualitative, channel-defined fingerprint of SPT order that is intrinsic to open-system dynamics and goes beyond equilibrium linear response.
Paper Structure (27 sections, 1 theorem, 148 equations, 8 figures)

This paper contains 27 sections, 1 theorem, 148 equations, 8 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1

For an SPT wavefunction protected by a $G\times S$ symmetry, where $G$-defects are decorated by $S$ charge, applying a decoherence channel that measures (or dephases) the local $S$-charge density generically drives strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking (SWSSB) of the $G$ symmetry in the resul

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: String order parameter $O_{\text{str}}(r, r^\prime)$ (blue) for ZXZ model ground state $|\psi (h)\rangle$ and Rényi-2 correlator $R^{(2)}(r, r^\prime)$ (orange) for the decohered mixed state $\rho(h)$\ref{['eq.zxz_mixed_state']} versus magnetic field strength $h$ . DMRG parameters: Open boundary condition, system size $L = 1000$, bond dimension $\chi=100$, up to 100 sweeps. $2r = L / 4, 2r^\prime = 3L/4$.
  • Figure 2: Strange correlator (blue) for ZXZ model ground state $|\psi(h)\rangle$ and type-II strange correlator for decohered state $\rho(h)$\ref{['eq.zxz_mixed_state']} versus field strength $h$. DMRG parameters: Open boundary condition, system size $L = 1000$, bond dimension $\chi=100$, up to 100 sweeps. $2r = L / 4, 2r^\prime = 3L/4$.
  • Figure 3: (a) CMI $I(A:B|C)$ and (b) Negativity $\mathcal{N}(\rho)$ for the decohered mixed state $\rho(h)$\ref{['eq.zxz_mixed_state']} versus field strength $h$. DMRG parameters: system size $L = 1000$, bond dimension $\chi=100$, up to 100 sweeps.
  • Figure 4: String order parameter (blue) for the ground state $|\psi(D)\rangle$ of the spin-1 model \ref{['eq.spin_1_hamiltonian']} and Rényi-2 correlator (orange) for the decohered mixed state $\rho(D)$ in \ref{['eq.spin_1_mixed_state']}. DMRG parameters: Open boundary condition, system size $L = 4000$, bond dimension $\chi=100$, up to 100 sweeps. $r = L / 4, r^\prime = 3L/4$.
  • Figure 5: (a) Rényi-2 correlator \ref{['eq.renyi_2_qshe_S']} versus distance $r$. Periodic boundary condition is used, therefore $r=20$ is equivalent to $r=0$. (b) Logarithm $\ln { R^{(2)}}$ versus logarithm of distance $\ln r$. This linearity indicates that the correlation has power-law decay. Monte Carlo simulation parameters: $L = 20$, update $200$k steps, measure for each $10$ steps. Decoherence strength $p=\frac{1}{2}$, Haldane model parameters: $t_1 = 1, t_2 = 0.3, m=0, \phi=\pi/2$.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • Proposition 1