Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Spherically Symmetric Gravity on a Graph I: Theoretical Foundations

Klaus Liegener, Saeed Rastgoo, Jorden Roberts

Abstract

This manuscript is the first in a series of instalments that investigate spherically symmetric solutions within the effective dynamics program of Loop Quantum Gravity. The choice of lattice is adapted such that it remains invariant under a set of symmetry transformations maximally mapping spherical symmetry to the discrete setting. The conditions for symmetry restriction of the dynamics are investigated and a subspace is identified to make computations feasible. Afterwards symplectic structure and scalar constraint are explicitly computed on this subspace. This lays the groundwork to target several particular solutions, such $k=1$ cosmology and black holes, which will serve as the subjects of forthcoming follow-up papers.

Spherically Symmetric Gravity on a Graph I: Theoretical Foundations

Abstract

This manuscript is the first in a series of instalments that investigate spherically symmetric solutions within the effective dynamics program of Loop Quantum Gravity. The choice of lattice is adapted such that it remains invariant under a set of symmetry transformations maximally mapping spherical symmetry to the discrete setting. The conditions for symmetry restriction of the dynamics are investigated and a subspace is identified to make computations feasible. Afterwards symplectic structure and scalar constraint are explicitly computed on this subspace. This lays the groundwork to target several particular solutions, such cosmology and black holes, which will serve as the subjects of forthcoming follow-up papers.
Paper Structure (27 sections, 1 theorem, 150 equations, 6 figures)

This paper contains 27 sections, 1 theorem, 150 equations, 6 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Let $(\mathcal{M},\omega)$ be a symplectic manifold and $\Phi < \mathop{\mathrm{Symp}}\nolimits(\mathcal{M},\omega)$ a symmetry group. Suppose that $\overline{\mathcal{M}}\subset \mathcal{M}$ is the $\Phi$-invariant subspace and $\overline{\omega}\coloneqq \omega|_{\overline{\mathcal{M}}}$ is nondeg

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of the effective dynamics algorithm outlined in Sec. \ref{['s4.1:algorithm']}. The top row depicts the symmetry restriction procedure in the continuum theory (see Sec. \ref{['s2.3:symmetry_restriction']}), while the second row illustrates the analogous procedure in the discretized theory (see Sec. \ref{['s3.3:symmetry_restriction']}). In transitioning from the continuum to the discretized theory, one must choose a discretization map $\mathfrak{D}_\gamma$, a regularized Hamiltonian $H_\gamma$, and translate the continuum symmetry group $\Phi^\Psi_\text{AB} < O(3)\rtimes\mathop{\mathrm{Diff}}\nolimits(\Sigma)$ to a discrete analog $\Phi^\Psi_\gamma < SU(2) \rtimes \mathrm{Stab}(\gamma,\gamma^*)$, where $\mathrm{Stab}(\gamma,\gamma^*) < \mathop{\mathrm{Diff}}\nolimits(\Sigma)$ is the set of all graph-preserving diffeomorphisms for the chosen spatial discretization. Once the truncated system is restricted to $(\overline{\mathcal{M}}_\gamma,\overline{\omega}_\gamma,\overline{H}_\gamma)$, one may choose to impose controlled approximations and construct an effective system $(\overline{\mathcal{M}}_\gamma, \overline{\omega}_\text{eff},\overline{H}_\text{eff})$. Lastly, one replaces the unphysical lattice spacing with a physical regulator, $\varepsilon \mapsto \bar{\mu}$, in order to obtain the final effective theory.
  • Figure 2: Graphic depiction of the edges (left) and surfaces (right) comprising the building blocks of a spherical graph $\gamma$ and its dual $\gamma^*$. On the left, arrows have been placed on the three positively-oriented edges defined at the vertex $v\in\gamma^v$, and the discretization parameter $n\in\mathbb{N}$ is encoded by the coordinate lengths $\varepsilon_i$ defined in \ref{['edge_length']}. On the right, the three positively-oriented surfaces associated with the vertex $v$ (situated in the centre of the cubic region) are labelled, and we note that each $\mathcal{S}^v_i$ has a coordinate area $\varepsilon_j\varepsilon_k$ with $i\neq j \neq k$.
  • Figure 3: Visualization of a spherical graph $\gamma$ (left) and the associated dual cell complex $\gamma^*$ (right) embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$. Each green point represents a vertex $v\in \gamma^v$, which are connected by edges adapted to the spherical coordinate directions. For each edge, there is exactly one corresponding surface in the dual graph.
  • Figure 4: Visual representations of the azimuthal (left) and polar (right) subgraphs defined in Eq. \ref{['subgraph_def']}. In Fig. \ref{['fig:gamma_phi']}, the red and blue lines correspond to the "mirrors" (i.e., axes of reflection) associated with the symmetry transformations $\rho_\varphi$, $\sigma_\varphi$, respectively (see \ref{['refl_phi']}). The dashed lines indicate mirrors associated with all other symmetries of the planar graph, each of which can be obtained from $\rho_\varphi$ or $\sigma_\varphi$ by means of the rotation \ref{['R_phi']}. Fig. \ref{['fig:gamma_pm']} contains a 3-dimensional mirror corresponding to the reflection $\rho_\theta$ (see \ref{['refl_theta']}), which exchanges the two disconnected components of the subgraph.
  • Figure 5: Depiction of the various phase spaces that we consider in both the continuum and truncated theories. On the left, the invariant subspace $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{\text{AB}}\subset\mathcal{M}_{\text{AB}}$ consists of all fixed points under the action of $\Phi^\Psi_{\text{AB}}$ (e.g., the blue point $m$). For points such as $m'\in\mathcal{M}_{\text{AB}}\backslash\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{\text{AB}}$, there exists at least one element $\phi_\psi\in\Phi^\Psi_{\text{AB}}$ such that $\mathcal{A}^R_{\phi_\psi}(m') = m" \neq m'$. On the right, we have the discretized phase space $\mathcal{M}_\gamma = \mathfrak{D}_\gamma(\mathcal{M}_{\text{AB}})$, where $\mathfrak{D}_\gamma = \{\mathfrak{D}_e\}_{e\in\gamma}$ denotes the collection of discretization maps associated with a graph $\gamma$. As in the continuum case, the invariant subspace $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_\gamma \subset \mathcal{M}_\gamma$ is defined with respect to a group $\Phi^\Psi_\gamma$ by $m_\gamma\in\overline{\mathcal{M}}_\gamma \iff \mathcal{A}^R_{\phi_\psi^\gamma}(m_\gamma) = m_\gamma$, $\forall \phi_\psi^\gamma\in\Phi^\Psi_\gamma$. Within $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_\gamma$, we also have the physically-relevant subspace $\overline{M}_{\gamma,\text{sym}} = \mathfrak{D}_\gamma(\overline{\mathcal{M}}_\gamma)$, which completes the tower of truncated phase spaces, $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{\gamma,\text{sym}} \subset \overline{\mathcal{M}}_\gamma \subset \mathcal{M}_\gamma$.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (3)

  • Theorem 2.1: Symmetry Restriction of Dynamics
  • proof
  • proof