Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Finite key analysis of experimentally realized practical COW-QKD protocol

Neha Pathania, Sandeep Mishra, Anirban Pathak

Abstract

An experimental implementation of the Coherent One-Way Quantum Key Distribution (COW-QKD) protocol is reported under realistic conditions, and a clean and easy-to-use framework for performing finite key analysis of the COW-QKD protocol is provided by extending a set of existing results. The framework provided here is used to perform finite key rate analysis of the COW-QKD protocol with respect to the actual parameters used in the experimental realization reported here. The system is kept running for several hours with different experimental parameters and stable secure key rates between 1.2 to 1.6 kbps are observed. In addition, QBER, phase error rate and secure key rate are obtained under finite key analysis, and it is shown that COW-QKD is secure for medium-range transmissions (up-to ~ 156 (171) km of optical fiber with 0.2 dB loss per km if detector efficiency is 0.1 (0.2) and other parameters are same as those used in this experiment).

Finite key analysis of experimentally realized practical COW-QKD protocol

Abstract

An experimental implementation of the Coherent One-Way Quantum Key Distribution (COW-QKD) protocol is reported under realistic conditions, and a clean and easy-to-use framework for performing finite key analysis of the COW-QKD protocol is provided by extending a set of existing results. The framework provided here is used to perform finite key rate analysis of the COW-QKD protocol with respect to the actual parameters used in the experimental realization reported here. The system is kept running for several hours with different experimental parameters and stable secure key rates between 1.2 to 1.6 kbps are observed. In addition, QBER, phase error rate and secure key rate are obtained under finite key analysis, and it is shown that COW-QKD is secure for medium-range transmissions (up-to ~ 156 (171) km of optical fiber with 0.2 dB loss per km if detector efficiency is 0.1 (0.2) and other parameters are same as those used in this experiment).
Paper Structure (12 sections, 25 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 12 sections, 25 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: (Color online) Schematic diagram of COW-QKD Protocol showing action of beam splitter
  • Figure 2: (Color online) Stability Analysis of QBER(%) and SKR(Kbps) w.r.t time (hrs) (at $\eta_d = 0.20$, $DT= 30 \mu s$, $DR=10\%$, $CR=80\%$)
  • Figure 3: (Color online) Variation of QBER vs temperature (at $\eta_d = 0.20$, $DT= 30 \mu s$, $DR=10\%$, $CR=80\%$)
  • Figure 4: (Color online) Variation of secure key rate vs temperature (at $\eta_d = 0.20$, $DT= 30 \mu s$, $DR=10\%$, $CR=80\%$)
  • Figure 5: (Color Online) Variation of QBER (%) vs Fiber Distance (km). The blue line and green line show the variation when the detector efficiency $\eta_d = 0.1$, and $\eta_d = 0.2$, respectively. The other parameters are $t_B=0.90$ and $\mu=0.5$.
  • ...and 4 more figures