Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hatcher-Thurston complex for surfaces with non-planar ends

Manvendra Somvanshi

Abstract

In this paper, for each $k\in \mathbb{N}$, we define a complex $Γ_k(S)$ for an infinite-type surface $S$ with non-planar ends, which serves as an analog of the Hatcher-Thurston complex for the infinite-type setting. We show that $Γ_k(S)$ is connected, simply connected, and that the automorphism group of $Γ_k(S)$ is isomorphic to the extended mapping class group.

Hatcher-Thurston complex for surfaces with non-planar ends

Abstract

In this paper, for each , we define a complex for an infinite-type surface with non-planar ends, which serves as an analog of the Hatcher-Thurston complex for the infinite-type setting. We show that is connected, simply connected, and that the automorphism group of is isomorphic to the extended mapping class group.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 16 theorems, 3 equations, 11 figures)

This paper contains 3 sections, 16 theorems, 3 equations, 11 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $S$ be a surface of infinite-type with non-planar ends. Then $\Gamma_k(S)$ is connected and simply connected for each $k\in \mathbb{N}$.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Constructing the path from $v$ to $w$.
  • Figure 2: Splitting the closed path $p$ into triangles.
  • Figure 3: Examples of the three cases in proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:radius-1']}.
  • Figure 4: Splitting the path $p$ into paths of type $1$, $2$, and $3$.
  • Figure 5: The construction in Case 1. Here $q_0$ is a $(a_0,a_1)-$segment, $q_1$ is a $a_1-$segment, and $q_2$ is a $a_2-$segment. The path in red has one less segment than $p$.
  • ...and 6 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (31)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Corollary 3
  • Theorem 1.1: Theorem 1, hernandez
  • Theorem 1.2: Theorem 1.1, hatcher
  • Definition 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of first half of Theorem \ref{['thm:simply']}
  • Definition 2.2
  • ...and 21 more