Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A sound horizon independent measurement of $H_0$ from BOSS, DESI and DES Y3

Zhiyu Lu, Théo Simon, Vivian Poulin, Yifu Cai

Abstract

We present a sound horizon independent measurement of the Hubble parameter using a multiprobe large-scale structure analysis. Removing the dependency on the sound horizon with a rescaling procedure at the matter power spectrum level, we analyse the BOSS full-shape power spectrum and bispectrum (for the first time) using the effective field theory of large-scale structure up to one loop. We combine this analysis with the auto- and cross-angular power spectra from the DESI Legacy Imaging Survey DR9, the $3 \times 2$pt analysis from DES Y3, and the CMB gravitational lensing power spectrum from Planck PR3. Our baseline analysis, that does not rely on supernovae data, yields $h = 0.702^{+0.022}_{-0.024}$, $Ω_m = 0.310 \pm 0.013$, and $σ_8 = 0.799 \pm 0.020$, corresponding to $3-4 \%$ precision measurements. When adding supernovae data from Pantheon+, we obtain a $2.6 \%$ measurement of $h$, with $h = 0.686 \pm 0.018$. We further note that our EFTBOSS analysis indicates a slight deviation of the BAO scale parameter (at $1.8 σ$) from its $Λ$CDM value, caused by the small scales of the bispectrum. We finally use the sound horizon-free EFTBOSS analysis as a diagnosis for the presence of new physics, finding that our results are consistent with the recent hints of evolving dark energy.

A sound horizon independent measurement of $H_0$ from BOSS, DESI and DES Y3

Abstract

We present a sound horizon independent measurement of the Hubble parameter using a multiprobe large-scale structure analysis. Removing the dependency on the sound horizon with a rescaling procedure at the matter power spectrum level, we analyse the BOSS full-shape power spectrum and bispectrum (for the first time) using the effective field theory of large-scale structure up to one loop. We combine this analysis with the auto- and cross-angular power spectra from the DESI Legacy Imaging Survey DR9, the pt analysis from DES Y3, and the CMB gravitational lensing power spectrum from Planck PR3. Our baseline analysis, that does not rely on supernovae data, yields , , and , corresponding to precision measurements. When adding supernovae data from Pantheon+, we obtain a measurement of , with . We further note that our EFTBOSS analysis indicates a slight deviation of the BAO scale parameter (at ) from its CDM value, caused by the small scales of the bispectrum. We finally use the sound horizon-free EFTBOSS analysis as a diagnosis for the presence of new physics, finding that our results are consistent with the recent hints of evolving dark energy.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 3 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 11 sections, 3 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Summary of recent sound horizon-free determinations of the Hubble parameter $H_0$. In this plot, BAO data are always treated in a sound horizon-agnostic way, while "$n_s$", "$A_s$" and "$S_8$" indicate that Gaussian priors are imposed on these parameters (which are not necessarily the same for all analyses). The shaded bands denote the $1\sigma$ and $2\sigma$ regions from PlanckPlanck:2018vyg (in pink) and SH0ES Riess:2021jrx (in grey).
  • Figure 2: Top left -- 2D posterior distributions from the individual sound horizon-free likelihoods considered in this work, with $\omega_b$ and $n_s$ fixed. Top right -- 2D posterior distributions from several EFTBOSS configurations. Bottom left -- 2D posterior distributions from several sound horizon-free likelihood combinations, using the prior on $n_s$ and $\omega_b$ defined in Sec. \ref{['sec:data']}. Bottom right -- 2D posterior distributions from several combinations between our baseline analysis, Pantheon+ and DESI DR2 BAO. In all panels, the dashed lines correspond to the Planck mean values from TTTEEE + Lensing Planck:2018vyg.
  • Figure 3: 1D posterior distributions of $\{h, \, \Omega_m, \, \sigma_8, \, \alpha_{r_s} \}$ from the EFTBOSS 2+3pt analysis for several maximum bispectrum scales $k_{\rm max}^B$. We display the constraints of the analysis with (in green) and without (in black) the marginalization on the sound horizon.
  • Figure 4: 2D posterior distributions from the full dataset, namely Lensing + EFTBOSS (2+3pt) + DESI$C_\ell$ + EFTDES + PanPlus + $\Omega_m^{\rm DESIDR2BAO}$, for the $\alpha_{r_s}$-free and $\alpha_{r_s}$-fix analyses. For comparison, we display the posteriors from PlanckPlanck:2018vyg in red and the SH0ES constraint on $H_0$Riess:2021jrx in grey shaded bands.
  • Figure 5: 2D posterior distributions from the $\Lambda$CDM fit to the EFTBOSS 2+3pt mock data generated with the early dark energy cosmology (left panel) and evolving dark energy cosmology (right panel) displayed in Tab. \ref{['table:mock_cosmology']}. The fiducial cosmologies are shown in dashed lines. We show the reconstructed parameters from both the $\alpha_{r_s}$-free and the $\alpha_{r_s}$-fix analyses, with the two values of $k^B_{\rm max}$ considered in this work, fixing $n_s = 0.965$ and $\omega_b = 0.02235$.
  • ...and 1 more figures