Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Non-commutative rings with infinitely many maximal subrings

Alborz Azarang

Abstract

We study rings with infinitely (only finitely) many maximal subrings. We prove that if $M$ is a maximal left/right ideal of a ring $T$ which is not an ideal of $T$, and $R$ is the idealizer of $M$, then $T$ has at least $|R/M|+1$ maximal left/right ideals which are not an ideal of $T$; in particular $T$ has at least $|R/M|+1$ distinct maximal subrings. Moreover, if $T$ is a $K$-algebra over an infinite field $K$, then either $T$ has infinitely many maximal subrings or $T$ is a quasi duo ring with certain algebraic properties similar to commutative rings. We prove that for a simple ring $R$, the ring $R\times R$ has only finitely many maximal subrings if and only if $R$ is finite. Also we study rings which are integral over their centers and have only finitely many maximal subrings. We prove that if $T$ is integral over its center and $T$ has more than $2^{\aleph_0}$ maximal (left/right) ideals, then $T$ has infinitely many maximal subrings. In particular, we see that if a $J$-semisimple ring $T$ is integral over its center and has only finitely many maximal subrings, then $T$ embeds in $S\times \prod_{i\in I}E_i$, where each $E_i$ is an absolutely algebraic field and $S$ is a finite semisimple ring. We see that if $T$ is a left Noetherian algebraic $K$-algebra over an infinite field $K$ and $T$ has only finitely many maximal subrings, then $T$ is a countable left Artinian ring which is integral over $\mathbb{Z}_p$, where $p=Char(K)$. We exactly determine when $T=\prod_{i\in I}\mathbb{M}_{n_i}(E_i)$, where each $E_i$ is a field and $n_i\in\mathbb{N}$, has only finitely many maximal subrings. We see that if $R$ is an infinite Artinian ring, then $\mathbb{M}_n(R)$, $n>1$, and $R\times R$ have infinitely many maximal subrings.

Non-commutative rings with infinitely many maximal subrings

Abstract

We study rings with infinitely (only finitely) many maximal subrings. We prove that if is a maximal left/right ideal of a ring which is not an ideal of , and is the idealizer of , then has at least maximal left/right ideals which are not an ideal of ; in particular has at least distinct maximal subrings. Moreover, if is a -algebra over an infinite field , then either has infinitely many maximal subrings or is a quasi duo ring with certain algebraic properties similar to commutative rings. We prove that for a simple ring , the ring has only finitely many maximal subrings if and only if is finite. Also we study rings which are integral over their centers and have only finitely many maximal subrings. We prove that if is integral over its center and has more than maximal (left/right) ideals, then has infinitely many maximal subrings. In particular, we see that if a -semisimple ring is integral over its center and has only finitely many maximal subrings, then embeds in , where each is an absolutely algebraic field and is a finite semisimple ring. We see that if is a left Noetherian algebraic -algebra over an infinite field and has only finitely many maximal subrings, then is a countable left Artinian ring which is integral over , where . We exactly determine when , where each is a field and , has only finitely many maximal subrings. We see that if is an infinite Artinian ring, then , , and have infinitely many maximal subrings.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 46 theorems, 4 equations)

This paper contains 5 sections, 46 theorems, 4 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Assume that $T$ is a ring and $M\in \operatorname{{Max}_\ell}(T)$ is not an ideal of $T$ (i.e., $M$ is not a maximal ideal of $T$). Then $|[M]|\geq |\mathbb{I}(M)/M|+1$. In particular, $|\operatorname{{Max}_\ell}(T)\setminus \operatorname{Max}(T)|\geq |\mathbb{I}(M)/M|+1$.

Theorems & Definitions (90)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.3
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • Remark 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7
  • Lemma 2.8
  • ...and 80 more