Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Mach-Zehnder interferometer for in-situ characterization of atom traps

Alexander Wolf, Maxim A. Efremov

Abstract

Manipulating cold atoms in traps is a key tool for numerous realizations of quantum simulators and quantum sensors. They require accurate modeling and characterization of the underlying trapping potentials. We introduce a technique based on the Mach-Zehnder interferometer for in-situ characterization of weakly anharmonic potentials. By simulating the interferometer in an optical dipole trap, we can accurately determine its trap frequency and upper bounds onto anharmonicity magnitudes.

Mach-Zehnder interferometer for in-situ characterization of atom traps

Abstract

Manipulating cold atoms in traps is a key tool for numerous realizations of quantum simulators and quantum sensors. They require accurate modeling and characterization of the underlying trapping potentials. We introduce a technique based on the Mach-Zehnder interferometer for in-situ characterization of weakly anharmonic potentials. By simulating the interferometer in an optical dipole trap, we can accurately determine its trap frequency and upper bounds onto anharmonicity magnitudes.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 51 equations, 7 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 6 sections, 51 equations, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: (top) Harmonic trapping potentials of two internal states $\left| 1 \right\rangle$ (dashed) and $\left| 2 \right\rangle$ (solid) with spatial shift between the trap centers (minima). (bottom) Interferometer pulses (thick arrows) separated by time $T$ transfer atoms between the two states, automatically leading to moving and, generally, breathing wavepackets. The shown Mach-Zehnder configuration leads to a periodic two-path-interference of an upper (blue) and lower (red) wavepacket whenever the positions $q$ of their center-of-mass are sufficiently close.
  • Figure 2: (a) Positions $q$ and (b) widths $\sigma$ of the two wavepackets at the time of the final pulse $2T$ as a function of the time $T$ between the pulses. Here the parameters listed in Tab. \ref{['tab:example']} are used. (c) Signal $P_2$ of the interferometer for two pulse phase contributions $\Delta \Phi_\text{P}$. When $T$ matches the trap periods $2 \pi / \omega_2$ or $2 \pi / \omega_1$ (vertical lines) the wavepackets are identical at the last pulse and the phase $\varphi$ vanishes.
  • Figure 3: Signal $P_2$ of the 1D and 3D MZI for the time $T$ close to $10 \pi / \omega_2$. The parameters listed in Tab. \ref{['tab:example']} and the phase difference $\Delta \Phi_\text{P} = \pi / 2$ are used.
  • Figure 4: (a) Interferometer signals $P_2$ as a function of the pulse separation $T$. The trap parameters are listed in Tab. \ref{['tab:example']}. Solid lines are simulations of a Rabi-coupled two-level Hamiltonian including the influence of position-dependent detunings. (b) Trap frequencies $\omega$ and corresponding fits determined by simulating the 3D MZI inside an optical dipole trap for different trap separations $|z_{0,1} - z_{0,2}|$ and initial states.
  • Figure S1: Interferometer signals $P_2$ as a function of the time between the pulses $T$ obtained by simulating the MZI in a crossed optical dipole trap as discussed in the main text ($\Delta \Phi_\text{P} = 0$).
  • ...and 2 more figures