Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Photogalvanic effect in few layer graphene

Zhaohang Li, Kainan Chang, Haoyu Li, Yuwei Shan, Wei Xin, Jinluo Cheng, Haiyang Xu

Abstract

We systematically investigate the nonlinear photogalvanic effect in few-layer graphene with various stacking orders, including AA- and AB-stacked bilayers, and AAA-, ABA-, and ABC-stacked trilayers. Using a tight-binding model to describe the electronic states, the shift current conductivity and jerk current conductivity are calculated over a broad spectral range from terahertz to visible frequencies. Our symmetry analysis reveals that a nonvanishing shift current emerges only in ABA-stacked trilayer graphene due to its broken inversion symmetry, with a peak conductivity reaching approximately $1.21 \times 10^{-13}$ A$\cdot$m/V$^2$ at optimal doping. In contrast, the jerk current, permitted in all structures, requires an in-plane static electric field and exhibits pronounced spectral tunability with chemical potential. These findings establish a comprehensive symmetry-band-field coupling paradigm for nonlinear photocurrents in layered graphene and provide design principles for tunable, polarization-sensitive photodetection and energy-harvesting devices based on van der Waals heterostructures.

Photogalvanic effect in few layer graphene

Abstract

We systematically investigate the nonlinear photogalvanic effect in few-layer graphene with various stacking orders, including AA- and AB-stacked bilayers, and AAA-, ABA-, and ABC-stacked trilayers. Using a tight-binding model to describe the electronic states, the shift current conductivity and jerk current conductivity are calculated over a broad spectral range from terahertz to visible frequencies. Our symmetry analysis reveals that a nonvanishing shift current emerges only in ABA-stacked trilayer graphene due to its broken inversion symmetry, with a peak conductivity reaching approximately Am/V at optimal doping. In contrast, the jerk current, permitted in all structures, requires an in-plane static electric field and exhibits pronounced spectral tunability with chemical potential. These findings establish a comprehensive symmetry-band-field coupling paradigm for nonlinear photocurrents in layered graphene and provide design principles for tunable, polarization-sensitive photodetection and energy-harvesting devices based on van der Waals heterostructures.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 19 equations, 5 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 12 sections, 19 equations, 5 figures, 1 table.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the shift current response collected by electrodes along the $x$- and $y$-directions. (b) Electronic band structure of ABA-TG. Insert is a magnification of the middle part. Spectra of the shift conductivity $\sigma^{(2);xxy}$ for ABA-TG at (c) discrete chemical potentials $\mu =0, 0.2, 0.6$ eV and (d) at continuously varying chemical potentials, with $\gamma=33$ meV. (e) The lower half is similar to (c), but with $\gamma=5$ meV, and the upper half is JDOS of ABA-TG.
  • Figure 2: (a) Schematic of the jerk current response collected by electrodes along the $x$- and $y$-directions under an electrostatic field applied along the $y$-direction. (b) Two groups of considered few-layer graphene with structural diagrams. (c) Electronic band structure of AA-BG. (d) Spectra of the jerk conductivities Re[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], Im[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], and Re[$\sigma^{(3);xyyx}$] for AA-BG at a chemical potential $\mu=0$ eV (black lines), and for the combined two layers of monolayer graphene denoted Gr* (red lines). (e) Electronic band structure of AAA-BG. (f) Spectra of the jerk conductivities Re[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], Im[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], and Re[$\sigma^{(3);xyyx}$] for AAA-BG at a chemical potential $\mu=0$ eV (black lines), and for the combined three layers of monolayer graphene denoted Gr** (red lines). Note, the superimposed spectra are given by Eqs. \ref{['Gr-AA']} and \ref{['Gr-AAA']}.
  • Figure 3: Electronic band structures of (a) AB-BG, (c) ABC-TG, and (e) ABC-TG. Spectra of the jerk conductivities Re[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], Im[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], and Re[$\sigma^{(3);xyyx}$] at a chemical potential $\mu=0$ eV for (b) AB-BG, (d) ABC-TG, and (e) ABA-TG, with insets for small damping of $\gamma=5$ meV.
  • Figure 4: Schematic diagram of different chemical potentials in (a) AA-BG and (c) AAA-TG. Spectra of the jerk conductivities Re[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], Im[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], and Re[$\sigma^{(3);xyyx}$] continuously changing with chemical potential in (b) AA-BG and (d) AAA-TG.
  • Figure 5: Schematic diagram of different chemical potentials in (a) AB-BG, (c) ABA-TG, and (e) ABC-TG. Spectra of the jerk conductivities Re[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], Im[$\sigma^{(3);xxyy}$], and Re[$\sigma^{(3);xyyx}$] continuously changing with chemical potential in (b) AB-BG, (d) ABA-TG, and (f) ABC-TG.