Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Drift Localization using Conformal Predictions

Fabian Hinder, Valerie Vaquet, Johannes Brinkrolf, Barbara Hammer

TL;DR

This work considers a fundamentally different approach based on conformal predictions for drift localization, which discusses and shows the shortcomings of common approaches and demonstrates the performance of this approach on state-of-the-art image datasets.

Abstract

Concept drift -- the change of the distribution over time -- poses significant challenges for learning systems and is of central interest for monitoring. Understanding drift is thus paramount, and drift localization -- determining which samples are affected by the drift -- is essential. While several approaches exist, most rely on local testing schemes, which tend to fail in high-dimensional, low-signal settings. In this work, we consider a fundamentally different approach based on conformal predictions. We discuss and show the shortcomings of common approaches and demonstrate the performance of our approach on state-of-the-art image datasets.

Drift Localization using Conformal Predictions

TL;DR

This work considers a fundamentally different approach based on conformal predictions for drift localization, which discusses and shows the shortcomings of common approaches and demonstrates the performance of this approach on state-of-the-art image datasets.

Abstract

Concept drift -- the change of the distribution over time -- poses significant challenges for learning systems and is of central interest for monitoring. Understanding drift is thus paramount, and drift localization -- determining which samples are affected by the drift -- is essential. While several approaches exist, most rely on local testing schemes, which tend to fail in high-dimensional, low-signal settings. In this work, we consider a fundamentally different approach based on conformal predictions. We discuss and show the shortcomings of common approaches and demonstrate the performance of our approach on state-of-the-art image datasets.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 3 figures, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 11 sections, 3 figures, 1 algorithm.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Effect of grouping-test/calibration-set sizes. (Decision tree, Fish-head dataset, 500 samples, 98 drifting)
  • Figure 2: Effect of number of bootstraps on ROC-AUC. Figure shows aggregation of 500 runs on FishHead dataset.
  • Figure 3: Experimental results. ROC-AUC (500 runs) for various drift localizes using windows of 250/60 samples with 98/10 drifting samples (in total).