Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Covering a Polyomino-Shaped Stain with Non-Overlapping Identical Stickers

Keigo Oka, Naoki Inaba, Akira Iino

TL;DR

This work studies Troublesome Sticker: the question of whether a stain $Q$ (a polyomino) is always flatly coverable by non-overlapping copies of a single sticker $P$ under translations, rotations, and reflections. It delivers a complete classification: no polyomino with $|Q|\ge 7$ is always-coverable, while a finite family $\mathcal{J}$ consists of always-coverable shapes (with pentomino Y and T explicitly proven), and a finite $\mathcal{I}$ contains not always-coverable shapes; an $O(1)$-time decision procedure decides the property for any $Q$. The paper also establishes $\mathrm{NP}$-hardness of Flat Cover in 2D via a gadget-based reduction from 3-Precoloring Extension and $\mathrm{NP}$-completeness in 1D via a reduction from X3C using a Golomb-ruler-based template, with correctness arguments tying covers to exact colorings or set covers. Together, these results yield both a practical decision tool for always-coverable stains and strong complexity barriers for the general covering problem, plus open questions about broader domains and constrained variants.

Abstract

You find a stain on the wall and decide to cover it with non-overlapping stickers of a single identical shape (rotation and reflection are allowed). Is it possible to find a sticker shape that fails to cover the stain? In this paper, we consider this problem under polyomino constraints and complete the classification of always-coverable stain shapes (polyominoes). We provide proofs for the maximal always-coverable polyominoes and construct concrete counterexamples for the minimal not always-coverable ones, demonstrating that such cases exist even among hole-free polyominoes. This classification consequently yields an algorithm to determine the always-coverability of any given stain. We also show that the problem of determining whether a given sticker can cover a given stain is $\NP$-complete, even though exact cover is not demanded. This result extends to the 1D case where the connectivity requirement is removed. As an illustration of the problem complexity, for a specific hexomino (6-cell) stain, the smallest sticker found in our search that avoids covering it has, although not proven minimum, a bounding box of $325 \times 325$.

Covering a Polyomino-Shaped Stain with Non-Overlapping Identical Stickers

TL;DR

This work studies Troublesome Sticker: the question of whether a stain (a polyomino) is always flatly coverable by non-overlapping copies of a single sticker under translations, rotations, and reflections. It delivers a complete classification: no polyomino with is always-coverable, while a finite family consists of always-coverable shapes (with pentomino Y and T explicitly proven), and a finite contains not always-coverable shapes; an -time decision procedure decides the property for any . The paper also establishes -hardness of Flat Cover in 2D via a gadget-based reduction from 3-Precoloring Extension and -completeness in 1D via a reduction from X3C using a Golomb-ruler-based template, with correctness arguments tying covers to exact colorings or set covers. Together, these results yield both a practical decision tool for always-coverable stains and strong complexity barriers for the general covering problem, plus open questions about broader domains and constrained variants.

Abstract

You find a stain on the wall and decide to cover it with non-overlapping stickers of a single identical shape (rotation and reflection are allowed). Is it possible to find a sticker shape that fails to cover the stain? In this paper, we consider this problem under polyomino constraints and complete the classification of always-coverable stain shapes (polyominoes). We provide proofs for the maximal always-coverable polyominoes and construct concrete counterexamples for the minimal not always-coverable ones, demonstrating that such cases exist even among hole-free polyominoes. This classification consequently yields an algorithm to determine the always-coverability of any given stain. We also show that the problem of determining whether a given sticker can cover a given stain is -complete, even though exact cover is not demanded. This result extends to the 1D case where the connectivity requirement is removed. As an illustration of the problem complexity, for a specific hexomino (6-cell) stain, the smallest sticker found in our search that avoids covering it has, although not proven minimum, a bounding box of .
Paper Structure (12 sections, 14 theorems, 2 equations, 41 figures)

This paper contains 12 sections, 14 theorems, 2 equations, 41 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

There exists an algorithm that solves Troublesome Sticker$(\mathcal{P},\sim_E,\mathcal{P})$ in $O(1)$ time.

Figures (41)

  • Figure 1: Pentomino I ($1 \times 5$) shaped stain
  • Figure 2: The smallest known polyomino ($33 \times 33$) that never covers pentomino I
  • Figure 3: Not always-coverable polyominoes $\mathcal{I}$ and always-coverable polyominoes $\mathcal{J}$
  • Figure 4: Pentomino "Y"
  • Figure 5: Pentomino "T"
  • ...and 36 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Remark 3.3
  • Theorem 3.4
  • Corollary 3.5
  • Remark 3.6
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.7
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.8
  • ...and 19 more