Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Zero Variance Portfolio

Jinyuan Chang, Yi Ding, Zhentao Shi, Bo Zhang

TL;DR

The paper addresses high-dimensional minimum-variance portfolio optimization in regimes where the number of assets ($N$) far exceeds the sample size ($T$). It introduces Ridgelet, a tiny ridge-regularized estimator that yields a zero-variance portfolio on training data while enabling strong out-of-sample generalization, exhibiting a double-descent risk pattern. The authors show Ridgelet1 approximates the exact minimum-norm ZVP, whereas Ridgelet2 employs a consistent idiosyncratic covariance estimator (e.g., POET) to achieve oracle out-of-sample variance under $N\gg T$. Through extensive simulations and empirical applications to S&P 500 and Nikkei 225 data, Ridgelet2 consistently improves risk performance over standard benchmarks, offering a tuning-free, high-dimensional MVP approach with practical impact for asset management.

Abstract

When the number of assets is larger than the sample size, the minimum variance portfolio interpolates the training data, delivering pathological zero in-sample variance. We show that if the weights of the zero variance portfolio are learned by a novel ``Ridgelet'' estimator, in a new test data this portfolio enjoys out-of-sample generalizability. It exhibits the double descent phenomenon and can achieve optimal risk in the overparametrized regime when the number of assets dominates the sample size. In contrast, a ``Ridgeless'' estimator which invokes the pseudoinverse fails in-sample interpolation and diverges away from out-of-sample optimality. Extensive simulations and empirical studies demonstrate that the Ridgelet method performs competitively in high-dimensional portfolio optimization.

Zero Variance Portfolio

TL;DR

The paper addresses high-dimensional minimum-variance portfolio optimization in regimes where the number of assets () far exceeds the sample size (). It introduces Ridgelet, a tiny ridge-regularized estimator that yields a zero-variance portfolio on training data while enabling strong out-of-sample generalization, exhibiting a double-descent risk pattern. The authors show Ridgelet1 approximates the exact minimum-norm ZVP, whereas Ridgelet2 employs a consistent idiosyncratic covariance estimator (e.g., POET) to achieve oracle out-of-sample variance under . Through extensive simulations and empirical applications to S&P 500 and Nikkei 225 data, Ridgelet2 consistently improves risk performance over standard benchmarks, offering a tuning-free, high-dimensional MVP approach with practical impact for asset management.

Abstract

When the number of assets is larger than the sample size, the minimum variance portfolio interpolates the training data, delivering pathological zero in-sample variance. We show that if the weights of the zero variance portfolio are learned by a novel ``Ridgelet'' estimator, in a new test data this portfolio enjoys out-of-sample generalizability. It exhibits the double descent phenomenon and can achieve optimal risk in the overparametrized regime when the number of assets dominates the sample size. In contrast, a ``Ridgeless'' estimator which invokes the pseudoinverse fails in-sample interpolation and diverges away from out-of-sample optimality. Extensive simulations and empirical studies demonstrate that the Ridgelet method performs competitively in high-dimensional portfolio optimization.
Paper Structure (20 sections, 5 theorems, 49 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 20 sections, 5 theorems, 49 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Suppose $\boldsymbol{1} \notin \mathrm{span}(\mathbf R)$. If $N = T+1$, then a solution to ZVP eq:ZVP exists. If $N\geq T+2$, there are infinitely many solutions to eq:ZVP.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Risk curve of the MVP estimated with Ridgelet (left) and Ridgeless (right). The oracle minimum risk is a benchmark. The returns are generated from a factor model described in Section \ref{['sec:simu-DGP']}.
  • Figure 2: Scree plot of daily returns of S&P 500 Index Constituent stocks. We compute the sample covariance matrix of daily returns of S&P 500 Index stocks between 2020 and 2023. The Y-axis shows the ratios of its principal eigenvalues over the sum of all eigenvalues.
  • Figure 3: Relative Risk curves of Ridgelet. In the left panel, we draw the mean relative risks for various $N$s and fixed sample size $T=22$. In the right panel, we draw the mean relative risks for various $T$s and fixed dimension $N=500$. The mean relative risk is computed as the average from 10 replications. We use Setting 2, where the idiosyncratic covariance matrix is a sparse matrix.
  • Figure 4: Time-series of risks of MVPs between 2000 and 2023, learned with different numbers of stocks. We draw the annualized risks of MVP for $N=100$, $300$ and $500$ using the largest stocks by their capitalization. We include the Ridgelet1 (top) and Ridgelet2 (bottom) portfolios for training window $T=22$ and $T=63$.

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Lemma 1
  • Remark 1
  • Proposition 1
  • Remark 2
  • Proposition 2
  • Remark 3
  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2