Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hybrid Non-informative and Informative Prior Model-assisted Designs for Mid-trial Dose Insertion

Kana Yamada, Hisato Sunami, Kentaro Takeda, Keisuke Hanada, Masahiro Kojima

TL;DR

Methods to improve dose assignment and the selection of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the optimal biological dose (OBD) when a new dose level is added during an ongoing trial under a model-assisted framework are investigated by assigning informative prior information to the inserted dose.

Abstract

In oncology phase I trials, model-assisted designs have been increasingly adopted because they enable adaptive yet operationally simple dose adjustment based on accumulating safety data, leading to a paradigm shift in dose-escalation methodology. In practice, a single mid-trial dose insertion may be considered to examine safer doses and/or to collect more informative efficacy data. In this study, we investigate methods to improve dose assignment and the selection of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the optimal biological dose (OBD) when a new dose level is added during an ongoing trial under a model-assisted framework, by assigning informative prior information to the inserted dose. We propose a hybrid design that uses a non-informative model-assisted design at trial initiation and, upon dose insertion, applies an informative-prior extension only to the newly added dose. In addition, to address potential skeleton misspecification, we propose two adaptive extensions: (i) an online-weighting approach that updates the skeleton over time, and (ii) a Bayesian-mixture approach that robustly combines multiple candidate skeletons. We evaluate the proposed methods through simulation studies.

Hybrid Non-informative and Informative Prior Model-assisted Designs for Mid-trial Dose Insertion

TL;DR

Methods to improve dose assignment and the selection of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the optimal biological dose (OBD) when a new dose level is added during an ongoing trial under a model-assisted framework are investigated by assigning informative prior information to the inserted dose.

Abstract

In oncology phase I trials, model-assisted designs have been increasingly adopted because they enable adaptive yet operationally simple dose adjustment based on accumulating safety data, leading to a paradigm shift in dose-escalation methodology. In practice, a single mid-trial dose insertion may be considered to examine safer doses and/or to collect more informative efficacy data. In this study, we investigate methods to improve dose assignment and the selection of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the optimal biological dose (OBD) when a new dose level is added during an ongoing trial under a model-assisted framework, by assigning informative prior information to the inserted dose. We propose a hybrid design that uses a non-informative model-assisted design at trial initiation and, upon dose insertion, applies an informative-prior extension only to the newly added dose. In addition, to address potential skeleton misspecification, we propose two adaptive extensions: (i) an online-weighting approach that updates the skeleton over time, and (ii) a Bayesian-mixture approach that robustly combines multiple candidate skeletons. We evaluate the proposed methods through simulation studies.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 29 equations, 9 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 14 sections, 29 equations, 9 figures, 1 table.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: An Example of the Study Motivation
  • Figure 2: Percentage of correct MTD selection for BOIN-related designs in fixed case
  • Figure 3: Percentage of correct MTD selection for BOIN-ET-related designs in fixed case
  • Figure 4: Percentage of correct OBD selection for BOIN-ET-related designs in fixed case
  • Figure 5: Percentage of correct MTD selection for BOIN-related designs in random case
  • ...and 4 more figures