Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Optimal error estimate of an isoparametric upwind discontinuous Galerkin method for radiation transport equation on curved domains

Changhui Yao, Yunpan Ma, Lingxiao Li

TL;DR

The paper addresses the stationary radiation transport equation $\Omega\cdot \nabla I + \sigma I = f$ in a curved domain $D$ with inflow data on $\Gamma^-$ and develops an isoparametric mapping-based upwind discontinuous Galerkin method to recover the optimal convergence by balancing geometry and discretization errors. It introduces an isoparametric framework with a mapping $F_h$ from a straight reference mesh to the curved domain and an auxiliary mapping to separate geometric error from discretization error, proving an $O(h^{k+1/2})$ convergence in the DG norm for $k\ge 2$. The key contributions include establishing bounds on the isoparametric approximation error $||\tilde{I}-\Lambda\tilde{I}||_{DG}$ and the geometric inflow boundary error, along with a tight consistency error analysis for the upwind DG scheme. Numerical experiments in both 2D and 3D corroborate the theory, showing that curved-domain isoparametric DG achieves the predicted rates and outperforms straight-mesh discretizations, thereby enabling accurate high-order RTE simulations on curved geometries.

Abstract

This work investigates the isoparametric upwind discontinuous Galerkin method for solving the radiation transport equation defined on a bounded domain $D$ with a piecewise $C^{k+1}$ smooth curved boundary. An auxiliary mapping is constructed to approximate the original curved domain. The analysis delineates a high-order optimal convergence rate under the DG norm, which comprehensively balances the errors stemming from the numerical discretization and the geometric approximation. Two- and three-dimensional numerical experiments validate the theoretical results.

Optimal error estimate of an isoparametric upwind discontinuous Galerkin method for radiation transport equation on curved domains

TL;DR

The paper addresses the stationary radiation transport equation in a curved domain with inflow data on and develops an isoparametric mapping-based upwind discontinuous Galerkin method to recover the optimal convergence by balancing geometry and discretization errors. It introduces an isoparametric framework with a mapping from a straight reference mesh to the curved domain and an auxiliary mapping to separate geometric error from discretization error, proving an convergence in the DG norm for . The key contributions include establishing bounds on the isoparametric approximation error and the geometric inflow boundary error, along with a tight consistency error analysis for the upwind DG scheme. Numerical experiments in both 2D and 3D corroborate the theory, showing that curved-domain isoparametric DG achieves the predicted rates and outperforms straight-mesh discretizations, thereby enabling accurate high-order RTE simulations on curved geometries.

Abstract

This work investigates the isoparametric upwind discontinuous Galerkin method for solving the radiation transport equation defined on a bounded domain with a piecewise smooth curved boundary. An auxiliary mapping is constructed to approximate the original curved domain. The analysis delineates a high-order optimal convergence rate under the DG norm, which comprehensively balances the errors stemming from the numerical discretization and the geometric approximation. Two- and three-dimensional numerical experiments validate the theoretical results.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 8 theorems, 60 equations, 2 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 13 sections, 8 theorems, 60 equations, 2 figures, 4 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Assume that there exist two positive constants $m$ and $M$ such that $0<m\leq\sigma\leq M$. Then the numerical solution $I_h$ of (eq2.4) obeys the bound

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Isoparametric mapping and numerical results in 2D. Left: The straight mesh $\mathcal{\widehat{T}}_{h_1}$ (yellow), interpolation nodes (blue), and curved domain boundary (red) after isoparametric mapping with $k=2$. Right: Numerical and theoretical convergence rate on $\mathcal{T}_h$ for $k=2$ and $k=3$.
  • Figure 2: Mesh and domain evolution through isoparametric mapping in 3D. Left: The straight mesh $\widehat{\mathcal{T}}_{h}$ with convex polyhedron domain $\widehat{D}_h$. Middle: The straight mesh $\widehat{\mathcal{T}}_{h}$ (light blue) with curved domain $D_h$ (gray). Right: The curved mesh $\mathcal{T}_{h}$ with curved domain $D_h$.

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Lemma 2.1
  • Remark 1
  • Lemma 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • Lemma 3.4
  • Lemma 3.5
  • Remark 2
  • Lemma 3.6
  • Theorem 3.7