Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A finite-difference summation-by-parts, conditionally stable partitioned algorithm for conjugate heat transfer problems

Sarah Nataj, David C. Del Rey Fernández, David Brown, Rajeev Jaiman

TL;DR

This work develops a high-order finite-difference partitioned solver for conjugate heat transfer problems by integrating summation-by-parts (SBP) operators with simultaneous approximation terms (SATs) on curvilinear grids. The left and right subdomains solve fluid-like and solid-like equations, respectively, and exchange interface data through carefully designed SAT penalties to yield provable conditional energy stability under a CFL-like time-step constraint and parameter choices. The authors extend the 1D SBP–SAT stability analysis to 3D curvilinear geometries, introduce time-extrapolation-based interface initial guesses (EXT) to improve accuracy, and demonstrate numerical verification with manufactured solutions, highlighting spatial convergence and interface behavior. The approach enables truly modular solvers for multi-physics problems on complex geometries while maintaining energy stability and high-order accuracy, with potential extensions to non-conforming meshes and more realistic turbulent transfer scenarios.

Abstract

In this work, we design and analyze a novel, provably conditionally stable, weakly coupled partitioned scheme to solve the conjugate heat transfer (CHT) problem. We consider a model CHT problem consisting of linear advection-diffusion and heat equations, coupled at an interface through continuity of temperature and heat flux. We employ high-order summation-by-parts finite-difference operators in conjunction with simultaneous-approximation-terms (SATs) in curvilinear coordinates for spatial derivatives, combined with first- and second-order time discretizations and temporal extrapolation at the interface. Energy stability is maintained by carefully selecting SAT parameters at the interface. A range of coupling parameters are explored to identify those that yield a stable scheme, and a stepwise approach for choosing SAT parameters that ensure stability is given. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated through numerical experiments in a two-dimensional model problem on a rectangular domain with curvilinear grids. The proposed approach enables the development of high-order, conditionally stable partitioned solvers suitable for general geometries.

A finite-difference summation-by-parts, conditionally stable partitioned algorithm for conjugate heat transfer problems

TL;DR

This work develops a high-order finite-difference partitioned solver for conjugate heat transfer problems by integrating summation-by-parts (SBP) operators with simultaneous approximation terms (SATs) on curvilinear grids. The left and right subdomains solve fluid-like and solid-like equations, respectively, and exchange interface data through carefully designed SAT penalties to yield provable conditional energy stability under a CFL-like time-step constraint and parameter choices. The authors extend the 1D SBP–SAT stability analysis to 3D curvilinear geometries, introduce time-extrapolation-based interface initial guesses (EXT) to improve accuracy, and demonstrate numerical verification with manufactured solutions, highlighting spatial convergence and interface behavior. The approach enables truly modular solvers for multi-physics problems on complex geometries while maintaining energy stability and high-order accuracy, with potential extensions to non-conforming meshes and more realistic turbulent transfer scenarios.

Abstract

In this work, we design and analyze a novel, provably conditionally stable, weakly coupled partitioned scheme to solve the conjugate heat transfer (CHT) problem. We consider a model CHT problem consisting of linear advection-diffusion and heat equations, coupled at an interface through continuity of temperature and heat flux. We employ high-order summation-by-parts finite-difference operators in conjunction with simultaneous-approximation-terms (SATs) in curvilinear coordinates for spatial derivatives, combined with first- and second-order time discretizations and temporal extrapolation at the interface. Energy stability is maintained by carefully selecting SAT parameters at the interface. A range of coupling parameters are explored to identify those that yield a stable scheme, and a stepwise approach for choosing SAT parameters that ensure stability is given. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated through numerical experiments in a two-dimensional model problem on a rectangular domain with curvilinear grids. The proposed approach enables the development of high-order, conditionally stable partitioned solvers suitable for general geometries.
Paper Structure (18 sections, 9 theorems, 164 equations, 6 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 18 sections, 9 theorems, 164 equations, 6 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $\,\overline{\mathsf{P}}_{}=\mathop{\mathrm{diag}}\nolimits(\hat{p}_1,\ldots,\hat{p}_{N_x})$ with $\hat{p}_i>0$. Define Then for any grid vector $\hbox{\boldmath $z$}\in\mathbb{R}^{N_x}$, where $\|\hbox{\boldmath $z$}\|^2_{\overline{\mathsf{P}}_{}}:=\hbox{\boldmath $z$}^{\mathrm{T}}\overline{\mathsf{P}}_{}\hbox{\boldmath $z$}$.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Domain representation for the model CHT problem in 2D.
  • Figure 2: Sequencing of coupling scheme for BE-EXT2 at the beginning of the loop.
  • Figure 3: The distribution of nodes on physical (left) and reference (right) domains
  • Figure 4: Results of spatial convergence study of iterated partitioned scheme ($N_{\ell oop}=2$) in comparison with monolithic scheme with time discretization BEFE where extrapolation in time of order 2 (EXT2) is used at interface. The results are given at final time $T=1$ with time step $\delta t= 10^{-4}$.
  • Figure 5: Comparison of the convergence of monolithic scheme, iterated BEFE-EXT1 and non-iterated BEFE-EXT2, $\delta t=10^{-4}$ and $p=3$.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (20)

  • definition thmcounterdefinition
  • Lemma 1: Discrete trace inequality in 1D
  • proof
  • Theorem 2: Stability of the monolithic 1D scheme
  • proof
  • Theorem 3: Stability of the partitioned 1D scheme
  • proof
  • Definition 4
  • Lemma 5
  • proof
  • ...and 10 more