Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hartree shift and pairing gap in ultracold Fermi gases in the framework of low-momentum interactions

Michael Urban, S. Ramanan

Abstract

In this paper we consider a two-component gas of fermions on the BCS side of the BCS-BEC crossover at zero temperature. We use a momentum dependent interaction that reproduces the s-wave scattering phase shifts of a contact interaction up to a momentum cutoff that is scaled with the Fermi momentum. Using a diagrammatic formulation of Bogoliubov many-body perturbation theory, suitably augmented by self-consistency conditions, we obtain the Hartree shift and the pairing gap to third order. In the weak-coupling regime, our results are not only well-converged but also agree with the well-established Gor'kov-Melik-Barkhudarov corrections for the gap and the Galitskii result for the Hartree shift. Near the unitary regime, our results for the Nambu-Gor'kov self-energy are less converged, but there is still reasonable agreement with experiments as well as with quantum Monte-Carlo results. Perspectives for improvements and applications of this approach to neutron matter are discussed.

Hartree shift and pairing gap in ultracold Fermi gases in the framework of low-momentum interactions

Abstract

In this paper we consider a two-component gas of fermions on the BCS side of the BCS-BEC crossover at zero temperature. We use a momentum dependent interaction that reproduces the s-wave scattering phase shifts of a contact interaction up to a momentum cutoff that is scaled with the Fermi momentum. Using a diagrammatic formulation of Bogoliubov many-body perturbation theory, suitably augmented by self-consistency conditions, we obtain the Hartree shift and the pairing gap to third order. In the weak-coupling regime, our results are not only well-converged but also agree with the well-established Gor'kov-Melik-Barkhudarov corrections for the gap and the Galitskii result for the Hartree shift. Near the unitary regime, our results for the Nambu-Gor'kov self-energy are less converged, but there is still reasonable agreement with experiments as well as with quantum Monte-Carlo results. Perspectives for improvements and applications of this approach to neutron matter are discussed.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 43 equations, 10 figures)

This paper contains 17 sections, 43 equations, 10 figures.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: Elements for Feynman diagrams: (a) $G^{(0)}_{\alpha\beta}(k,\omega)$, (b) $-V(\tfrac{\bm{\mathrm{k}}+\bm{\mathrm{p}}'}{2},\tfrac{\bm{\mathrm{k}}'+\bm{\mathrm{p}}}{2})$, (c) $-H_{\text{mf},\alpha\beta}(k)$.
  • Figure 2: (1.1a), (1.1b), and (1.mf) First-order self-energy diagrams. Diagram (1.1a) has been drawn differently in (1.1a$'$) to show that (1.1a) and (1.1b) can be compactly represented by one generic diagram denoted (1.1). (For simplicity, we denote the loop momentum as $k$ instead of $\bm{\mathrm{k}},\omega$ in the figures.)
  • Figure 3: (2.1a), (2.1b), and (2.mf) Diagrams for the second-order self-energy $\Sigma^{(2)}$. (2.1b$'$) Alternative way of drawing diagram (2.1b). (2.1) Generic diagram combining (2.1a) and (2.1b), showing the labeling used in the calculation.
  • Figure 4: Second-order self-energy diagrams that cancel as a consequence of Eq. \ref{['eq:HFB-Hmf']}.
  • Figure 5: Left column, (3.1)-(3.3): general form of the three classes of diagrams contributing to the third-order self-energy $\Sigma^{(3)}$ in perturbation theory on top of the HFB ground state. (3.4)-(3.mf): additional diagrams appearing in the more self-consistent scheme. Right column (3.1a)-(3.4b): corresponding individual diagrams.
  • ...and 5 more figures