Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Structured Prototype-Guided Adaptation for EEG Foundation Models

Jingying Ma, Feng Wu, Yucheng Xing, Qika Lin, Tianyu Liu, Chenyu Liu, Ziyu Jia, Mengling Feng

TL;DR

SCOPE, a Structured COnfidence-aware Prototype-guided adaptation framework for EFM fine-tuning, is proposed and demonstrated that SCOPE consistently achieves strong performance and efficiency under label-limited cross-subject settings.

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (EFMs) have achieved strong performance under full fine-tuning but exhibit poor generalization when subject-level supervision is limited, a common constraint in real-world clinical settings. We show that this failure stems not merely from limited supervision, but from a structural mismatch between noisy, limited supervision and the highly plastic parameter space of EFMs. To address this challenge, we propose SCOPE, a Structured COnfidence-aware Prototype-guided adaptation framework for EFM fine-tuning. SCOPE follows a two-stage pipeline. In the first stage, we construct reliable external supervision by learning geometry-regularized task priors, constructing balanced class-level prototypes over the resulting embeddings, and producing confidence-aware pseudo-labels from their agreement to filter unreliable signals on unlabeled data. In the second stage, we introduce ProAdapter, which adapts frozen EEG foundation models via a lightweight adapter conditioned on the structured prototypes. Experiments across three EEG tasks and five foundation model backbones demonstrate that SCOPE consistently achieves strong performance and efficiency under label-limited cross-subject settings.

Structured Prototype-Guided Adaptation for EEG Foundation Models

TL;DR

SCOPE, a Structured COnfidence-aware Prototype-guided adaptation framework for EFM fine-tuning, is proposed and demonstrated that SCOPE consistently achieves strong performance and efficiency under label-limited cross-subject settings.

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (EFMs) have achieved strong performance under full fine-tuning but exhibit poor generalization when subject-level supervision is limited, a common constraint in real-world clinical settings. We show that this failure stems not merely from limited supervision, but from a structural mismatch between noisy, limited supervision and the highly plastic parameter space of EFMs. To address this challenge, we propose SCOPE, a Structured COnfidence-aware Prototype-guided adaptation framework for EFM fine-tuning. SCOPE follows a two-stage pipeline. In the first stage, we construct reliable external supervision by learning geometry-regularized task priors, constructing balanced class-level prototypes over the resulting embeddings, and producing confidence-aware pseudo-labels from their agreement to filter unreliable signals on unlabeled data. In the second stage, we introduce ProAdapter, which adapts frozen EEG foundation models via a lightweight adapter conditioned on the structured prototypes. Experiments across three EEG tasks and five foundation model backbones demonstrate that SCOPE consistently achieves strong performance and efficiency under label-limited cross-subject settings.
Paper Structure (47 sections, 2 theorems, 26 equations, 14 figures, 17 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 47 sections, 2 theorems, 26 equations, 14 figures, 17 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Proposition 3.1

Let $\{\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{k}\}_{k=1}^{K}\subset\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ be the normalized classifier weights. If they satisfy the simplex equiangular tight frame condition $\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{k}^{\top}\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{k'} = -\frac{1}{K-1}, \qquad \forall\, k\neq k',$, the minimum pairwise angular sepa

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: CodeBrain under full fine-tuning on the ISRUC dataset. (A) Training and validation Kappa trajectories, illustrating the generalization gap under 30% versus 100% subjects supervision. (B) Validation Kappa across five random seeds when training with 30% labeled subjects, showing high sensitivity to initialization. (C) Calibration curve on the validation set under 30% subjects supervision, indicating overconfident predictions.
  • Figure 2: CodeBrain (8-layers EFM backbone) under full fine-tuning on the ISRUC dataset with 30% labeled subjects. (A) Early-stage training dynamics across different random seeds, showing instability and occasional collapse. (B) Layer-wise evolution of parameter space similarity during training, measured by centered kernel alignment (CKA), with low, mid, and deep layers.
  • Figure 3: Overview of the two-stage SCOPE framework. Left: External structured supervision construction progressively induces class-level prototypes and confidence-aware pseudo-labels for unlabeled data. Right: A frozen EEG foundation model is adapted via lightweight prototype-conditioned adapters in the last layers, using confidence-weighted supervision for controlled adaptation.
  • Figure 4: Sensitivity analysis of ProAdapter depth on ISRUC.
  • Figure 5: Sensitivity analysis of confidence threshold on ISRUC.
  • ...and 9 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Proposition 3.1
  • Lemma 3.2