Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Genus two Goeritz equivalence in lens spaces $L(p,1)$

Brandy Doleshal, Matt Rathbun

TL;DR

The paper studies genus two Goeritz equivalence for curves on the Heegaard surface of lens spaces $L(p,1)$ by encoding the Goeritz action as a $4\times4$ matrix representation $*: \mathcal{G}_p \to GL(4,\mathbb{Z})$ on a canonical homology basis. It establishes that the kernel of the star map is generated by $\beta^2$, and it provides a precise description of the image $*(\mathcal{G}_p)$, including explicit forms for small $p$ and a tractable subgroup description for large $p$ (via a projection to a top-left $2\times2$ block and a block-structure analysis). The paper then derives strong obstructions to Goeritz equivalence: homology obstructions yielding determinant and linear-relations constraints among homology vectors, and a homotopy obstruction showing that Goeritz equivalence among homologous curves is equivalent to being connected by reducing-sphere twists, with $\beta^2$ generating this twist subgroup. Together, these results provide concrete, computational criteria for deciding when two curves on the genus two Heegaard surface are Goeritz equivalent in $L(p,1)$, enriching the toolbox for studying lens-space knots and Dehn surgeries via Heegaard splittings.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the action of the Goeritz group $\mathcal G_p$ for the genus two Heegaard splitting of the lens space $L(p,1)$ with $p\ge 2$ on the homology of the Heegaard surface. We describe the action in terms of matrices in $GL(4, \mathbb Z)$, and provide homology and homotopy obstructions for when two curves in the Heegaard surface are Goeritz equivalent.

Genus two Goeritz equivalence in lens spaces $L(p,1)$

TL;DR

The paper studies genus two Goeritz equivalence for curves on the Heegaard surface of lens spaces by encoding the Goeritz action as a matrix representation on a canonical homology basis. It establishes that the kernel of the star map is generated by , and it provides a precise description of the image , including explicit forms for small and a tractable subgroup description for large (via a projection to a top-left block and a block-structure analysis). The paper then derives strong obstructions to Goeritz equivalence: homology obstructions yielding determinant and linear-relations constraints among homology vectors, and a homotopy obstruction showing that Goeritz equivalence among homologous curves is equivalent to being connected by reducing-sphere twists, with generating this twist subgroup. Together, these results provide concrete, computational criteria for deciding when two curves on the genus two Heegaard surface are Goeritz equivalent in , enriching the toolbox for studying lens-space knots and Dehn surgeries via Heegaard splittings.

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the action of the Goeritz group for the genus two Heegaard splitting of the lens space with on the homology of the Heegaard surface. We describe the action in terms of matrices in , and provide homology and homotopy obstructions for when two curves in the Heegaard surface are Goeritz equivalent.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 12 theorems, 32 equations, 15 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 12 theorems, 32 equations, 15 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

For $p \ge 2$, a presentation for the genus-2 Goeritz group $\mathcal{G}_p$ for the lens space $L(p,1)$ is given by:

Figures (15)

  • Figure 1: Standard homology basis for $F$, and the axis of rotation for the homeomorphisms $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
  • Figure 2: Pants decomposition of $F$ used to describe $\delta$, together with the resulting curves and sub-arcs of the homology basis, and $\partial D$, $\partial E$, $\partial F$.
  • Figure 3: The image $\delta(a)$, superimposed onto Figure \ref{['figure:deltabasepants']}.
  • Figure 4: The image $\delta(x)$, superimposed onto Figure \ref{['figure:deltabasepants']}.
  • Figure 5: The image $\delta(b)$, superimposed onto Figure \ref{['figure:deltabasepants']}.
  • ...and 10 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 2.1: Cho ChoG2GGLS
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.8
  • ...and 19 more