On the Lagarias Inequality and Superabundant Numbers
Andrew MacArevey
TL;DR
The Lagarias inequality provides a criterion equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis; the paper recasts it via the continuous harmonic extension $H(x)=\psi(x+1)+\gamma$ and the associated $L(x)$ and $B_n$ sequences, deriving $L'(x)=N(x)/x^2$. It then shows $N(x)\ge 0$ for $x\ge 1$ using bounds on $H(x)$ and $H'(x)$, which yields $L'(x)\ge 0$ and hence $B_{n+1}-B_n>0$ for $n\ge 55$ (with direct checks for $1\le n\le 54$). A key consequence is that any counterexample to Lagarias must occur at a superabundant number, significantly narrowing the verification focus and linking the problem to extremal divisor-sum properties, with potential implications for RH evidence.
Abstract
We study the Lagarias inequality, an elementary criterion equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis. Using a continuous extension of the harmonic numbers, we show that the sequence $B_n=\frac{H_n+e^{H_n}\log(H_n)}{n}$ is strictly increasing for $n\ge 1$. As a consequence, if the Lagarias inequality has counterexamples, then the least counterexample must be a superabundant number; equivalently, it suffices to verify the inequality on the superabundant numbers.
