Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Neel temperature and helical spin order of altermagnetic RuO2

Markus Meinert

Abstract

The magnetic groundstate of RuO$_2$ remains controversial, with experimental evidence for a nonmagnetic groundstate of ideal bulk material and indications of a magnetic state in strained thin films. Here, I investigate the Néel temperature of the (hypothetical) altermagnetic state of bulk RuO$_2$, stabilized via the DFT$+U$ technique, by mapping on a Heisenberg Hamiltonian. The Néel temperature scales monotonously with the magnetic moment up to the point where a large $+U$ term opens a band gap and turns RuO$_2$ semiconducting. The maximum Néel temperature obtained by this procedure is 408\,K at $U=3$\,eV, and much smaller values for smaller $U$. A reciprocal-space eigenvalue analysis reveals a helimagnetic groundstate of the spin model due to intra-sublattice antiferromagnetic coupling. This situation resembles the isostructural $β$-MnO$_2$, which is a prototype helimagnet. Further comparison with calculations on CrO$_2$ and altermagnetic MnF$_2$ taking $U$ as an adjustable parameter supports the validity of the spin model analysis.

Neel temperature and helical spin order of altermagnetic RuO2

Abstract

The magnetic groundstate of RuO remains controversial, with experimental evidence for a nonmagnetic groundstate of ideal bulk material and indications of a magnetic state in strained thin films. Here, I investigate the Néel temperature of the (hypothetical) altermagnetic state of bulk RuO, stabilized via the DFT technique, by mapping on a Heisenberg Hamiltonian. The Néel temperature scales monotonously with the magnetic moment up to the point where a large term opens a band gap and turns RuO semiconducting. The maximum Néel temperature obtained by this procedure is 408\,K at \,eV, and much smaller values for smaller . A reciprocal-space eigenvalue analysis reveals a helimagnetic groundstate of the spin model due to intra-sublattice antiferromagnetic coupling. This situation resembles the isostructural -MnO, which is a prototype helimagnet. Further comparison with calculations on CrO and altermagnetic MnF taking as an adjustable parameter supports the validity of the spin model analysis.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 8 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 3 sections, 8 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: a): Local magnetic moment of Ru atoms as a function of the Hubbard $+U$ parameter. b) Neel temperature as a function of $U$, calculated with RPA and classical Monte Carlo simulations. c): Same as b), given as a function of the local magnetic moment.
  • Figure 2: Calculations of Néel temperatures and magnetic moments for other rutile-structured materials: a) $\beta$-MnO$_2$, b) MnF$_2$, and c) CrO$_2$. Open symbols denote Monte Carlo results for the Néel temperature, full symbols are RPA results. Horizontal dashed lines indicate experimental Neel temperatures Zhou2018Collins1974Chamberland1977.
  • Figure 3: Real-space exchange interaction parameters $J_{ij}$ of RuO$_2$, MnO$_2$, MnF$_2$, and CrO$_2$ with $U$ values chosen such that $T_\mathrm{N}^{RPA}$ is closest to the experimental result. The interactions are resolved as intra-sublattice and inter-sublattice interactions.
  • Figure 4: a) Néel temperatures of RuO$_2$ obtained by Monte Carlo simulations on a monolayer (one unit cell), a bilayer (two unit cells), and bulk for comparison at $U =1.5$ eV. b) Mean sublattice magnetization length from Monte Carlo calculations on multilayers of RuO$_2$ with $U=1.5$ eV. Vertical dashed lines represent the expected minima positions according to the reciprocal-space eigenvalue analysis.