Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Bayesian Inference for Joint Tail Risk in Paired Biomarkers via Archimedean Copulas with Restricted Jeffreys Priors

Agnideep Aich, Md. Monzur Murshed, Sameera Hewage, Ashit Baran Aich

TL;DR

We address joint extremal dependence between two biomarkers by modeling their uniform margins with a one-parameter Archimedean copula and focusing on tail-risk functionals $R_L(\theta)$, $R_U(\theta)$, and $R_C(\theta)$. A restricted Jeffreys prior on the copula parameter $\theta$ and grid-based posterior yield exact posteriors for these functionals, with explicit forms for Clayton and Gumbel copulas. The approach is validated via simulations showing near-nominal coverage and applied to NHANES data (GLU–GHB), revealing substantial extremal co-movement relative to independence and illustrating how Clayton emphasizes lower-tail co-movement while Gumbel emphasizes upper-tail co-movement. Overall, the framework provides a principled, interpretable Bayesian method for reporting joint tail risks in biomedical settings with uncertainty quantification, and it lays groundwork for extensions to more copula families and higher-dimensional or longitudinal analyses.

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian copula-based framework to quantify clinically interpretable joint tail risks from paired continuous biomarkers. After converting each biomarker margin to rank-based pseudo-observations, we model dependence using one-parameter Archimedean copulas and focus on three probability-scale summaries at tail level $α$: the lower-tail joint risk $R_L(θ)=C_θ(α,α)$, the upper-tail joint risk $R_U(θ)=2α-1+C_θ(1-α,1-α)$, and the conditional lower-tail risk $R_C(θ)=R_L(θ)/α$. Uncertainty is quantified via a restricted Jeffreys prior on the copula parameter and grid-based posterior approximation, which induces an exact posterior for each tail-risk functional. In simulations from Clayton and Gumbel copulas across multiple dependence strengths, posterior credible intervals achieve near-nominal coverage for $R_L$, $R_U$, and $R_C$. We then analyze NHANES 2017--2018 fasting glucose (GLU) and HbA1c (GHB) ($n=2887$) at $α=0.05$, obtaining tight posterior credible intervals for both the dependence parameter and induced tail risks. The results reveal markedly elevated extremal co-movement relative to independence; under the Gumbel model, the posterior mean joint upper-tail risk is $R_U(α)=0.0286$, approximately $11.46\times$ the independence benchmark $α^2=0.0025$. Overall, the proposed approach provides a principled, dependence-aware method for reporting joint and conditional extremal-risk summaries with Bayesian uncertainty quantification in biomedical applications.

Bayesian Inference for Joint Tail Risk in Paired Biomarkers via Archimedean Copulas with Restricted Jeffreys Priors

TL;DR

We address joint extremal dependence between two biomarkers by modeling their uniform margins with a one-parameter Archimedean copula and focusing on tail-risk functionals , , and . A restricted Jeffreys prior on the copula parameter and grid-based posterior yield exact posteriors for these functionals, with explicit forms for Clayton and Gumbel copulas. The approach is validated via simulations showing near-nominal coverage and applied to NHANES data (GLU–GHB), revealing substantial extremal co-movement relative to independence and illustrating how Clayton emphasizes lower-tail co-movement while Gumbel emphasizes upper-tail co-movement. Overall, the framework provides a principled, interpretable Bayesian method for reporting joint tail risks in biomedical settings with uncertainty quantification, and it lays groundwork for extensions to more copula families and higher-dimensional or longitudinal analyses.

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian copula-based framework to quantify clinically interpretable joint tail risks from paired continuous biomarkers. After converting each biomarker margin to rank-based pseudo-observations, we model dependence using one-parameter Archimedean copulas and focus on three probability-scale summaries at tail level : the lower-tail joint risk , the upper-tail joint risk , and the conditional lower-tail risk . Uncertainty is quantified via a restricted Jeffreys prior on the copula parameter and grid-based posterior approximation, which induces an exact posterior for each tail-risk functional. In simulations from Clayton and Gumbel copulas across multiple dependence strengths, posterior credible intervals achieve near-nominal coverage for , , and . We then analyze NHANES 2017--2018 fasting glucose (GLU) and HbA1c (GHB) () at , obtaining tight posterior credible intervals for both the dependence parameter and induced tail risks. The results reveal markedly elevated extremal co-movement relative to independence; under the Gumbel model, the posterior mean joint upper-tail risk is , approximately the independence benchmark . Overall, the proposed approach provides a principled, dependence-aware method for reporting joint and conditional extremal-risk summaries with Bayesian uncertainty quantification in biomedical applications.
Paper Structure (44 sections, 1 theorem, 64 equations, 2 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 44 sections, 1 theorem, 64 equations, 2 figures, 4 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Assume: Then, conditionally on the data, and consequently, where $\widehat{\theta}$ can be taken as the MLE (or posterior mode; they coincide asymptotically). Here, $I(\widehat{\theta})$ serves as a consistent asymptotic plug-in for the true information $I(\theta_0)$. In particular,

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: NHANES GLU vs. GHB on the raw scale with marginal histograms.
  • Figure 2: Posterior distributions of $R_L(\alpha)$ (left) and $R_U(\alpha)$ (right) for NHANES GLU--GHB with $\alpha=0.05$ under Clayton and Gumbel copulas. Vertical lines denote posterior means; shaded regions denote 95% credible intervals.

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • Theorem 3.1: Posterior delta-method for $R_T(\theta)$