Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Point Count of the Top-dimensional Open Positroid Variety

Calvin Yost-Wolff

TL;DR

The paper proves a cohomological explanation for the finite-field point count of the top-dimensional open positroid variety $\Pi_{k,n}^\circ$ in the coprime case $\gcd(k,n)=1$. By relating the split torus action on $\Pi_{k,n}^\circ$ to an anisotropic torus action on a twisted rational form, and showing that the cyclic rotation $\rho$ acts trivially on the $T$-equivariant compactly supported étale cohomology, the author deduces an isomorphism of cohomology under the Fr-modules for the untwisted and twisted forms. This cohomological triviality transfers to equality of $\mathbb{F}_q$-points counts for the two forms, yielding a point-count identity that factors the open-positroid count by the torus sizes and recovers the known Grassmannian count scaled by $|(\mathbb{F}_q^\times)^n|/|\mathbb{F}_{q^n}^\times|$. The approach combines cohomological purity results, Lang’s theorem for torsors, and a Moore determinant argument to connect the combinatorics of $\mathrm{Gr}(k,n)(\mathbb{F}_q)$ with torus-orbit quotients and rational $q$-Catalan numbers, providing a pathway to similar results in related settings.

Abstract

In [GL24], Galashin and Lam discovered that when $k$ and $n$ are coprime, the proportion of subspaces in $\mathrm{Gr}(k,n)(\mathbb{F}_q)$ that lie in the top-dimensional open positroid variety $Π_{k,n}^\circ(\mathbb{F}_q)$ is $|(\mathbb{F}_q^\times)^n|/|\mathbb{F}_{q^n}^\times|$. In this paper, I recover this point count identity by relating the split torus action on $(Π_{k,n}^\circ)_{\mathbb{F}_q}$ and an anisotropic torus action on a $\mathbb{F}_q$ rational form of $Π_{k,n}^\circ$. The main step in the point count argument and the main technical result in this paper is that cyclic rotation acts trivially on the torus-equivariant cohomology of $Π_{k,n}^\circ$ when $k$ and $n$ are coprime.

Point Count of the Top-dimensional Open Positroid Variety

TL;DR

The paper proves a cohomological explanation for the finite-field point count of the top-dimensional open positroid variety in the coprime case . By relating the split torus action on to an anisotropic torus action on a twisted rational form, and showing that the cyclic rotation acts trivially on the -equivariant compactly supported étale cohomology, the author deduces an isomorphism of cohomology under the Fr-modules for the untwisted and twisted forms. This cohomological triviality transfers to equality of -points counts for the two forms, yielding a point-count identity that factors the open-positroid count by the torus sizes and recovers the known Grassmannian count scaled by . The approach combines cohomological purity results, Lang’s theorem for torsors, and a Moore determinant argument to connect the combinatorics of with torus-orbit quotients and rational -Catalan numbers, providing a pathway to similar results in related settings.

Abstract

In [GL24], Galashin and Lam discovered that when and are coprime, the proportion of subspaces in that lie in the top-dimensional open positroid variety is . In this paper, I recover this point count identity by relating the split torus action on and an anisotropic torus action on a rational form of . The main step in the point count argument and the main technical result in this paper is that cyclic rotation acts trivially on the torus-equivariant cohomology of when and are coprime.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 19 theorems, 74 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 19 theorems, 74 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $k$ and $n$ be coprime, and let $\Bbbk$ be an algebraically closed field with characteristic coprime to $\ell$ and $n$. Then $\rho$ acts trivially on $H_c^*((X_{k,n}^\circ)_{\Bbbk},\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})$.

Theorems & Definitions (38)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Conjecture 2.4: GLqtcat, Conjecture 1.21
  • Remark 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6: SGA4half, Grothendieck--Lefschetz trace formula
  • Theorem 2.7: DeligneLusztig1976, Theorem 3.2 Lefschetz for finite order automorphisms
  • ...and 28 more