Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Detection horizon for the neutrino burst from the stellar helium flash

Pablo Martínez-Miravé, Irene Tamborra, Georg Raffelt

Abstract

Low-mass stars ($M\lesssim 2\,M_\odot$) ignite helium under degenerate conditions, eventually causing a nuclear run-away -- the helium flash. The alpha-capture process on $^{14}$N produces a large amount of $^{18}$F, whose subsequent decay spawns an intense $ν_e$ burst (with average energy of $0.38$ MeV) lasting about a day. We show that, in addition, a strong $1.7$ MeV neutrino line is generated by electron capture on $^{18}$F. Detection is hindered by large backgrounds in state-of-the-art neutrino observatories, such as JUNO. In next-generation facilities, such as the Jinping neutrino experiment, the horizon for a detection with a local significance of $3 σ$ would be extended to almost $3$ pc. Although helium flashes occur a few times per year in our Galaxy, there are no stellar candidates approaching the tip of the red giant branch within $10$ pc. Hence, to date, asteroseismology remains the most promising tool for probing the most energetic thermonuclear event in the life of a low-mass star.

Detection horizon for the neutrino burst from the stellar helium flash

Abstract

Low-mass stars () ignite helium under degenerate conditions, eventually causing a nuclear run-away -- the helium flash. The alpha-capture process on N produces a large amount of F, whose subsequent decay spawns an intense burst (with average energy of MeV) lasting about a day. We show that, in addition, a strong MeV neutrino line is generated by electron capture on F. Detection is hindered by large backgrounds in state-of-the-art neutrino observatories, such as JUNO. In next-generation facilities, such as the Jinping neutrino experiment, the horizon for a detection with a local significance of would be extended to almost pc. Although helium flashes occur a few times per year in our Galaxy, there are no stellar candidates approaching the tip of the red giant branch within pc. Hence, to date, asteroseismology remains the most promising tool for probing the most energetic thermonuclear event in the life of a low-mass star.
Paper Structure (20 sections, 28 equations, 7 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 20 sections, 28 equations, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Evolution of the rate of energy release during the He flash of three models with ZAMS mass of $1$, $1.8$, and $2 \,M_\odot$. The upper (thin) lines refer to the $3\alpha$ reaction, the lower (thick) lines to $^{14}{\rm N}(\alpha,\gamma)$, leading to ${}^{18}{\rm F}$ production. Time is relative to $t_{\rm peak}$, i.e., the instant of maximum $L_{3\alpha}$. The vertical lines show the time offset of the maximum of $L_{{\rm N}\alpha}$ relative to $t_{\rm peak}$.
  • Figure 2: Core profiles of the $1\,M_\odot$ model for selected times before and after He ignition ($t-t_{\rm{peak}} = -3000$ years, $-5.5$ days, $-0.4$ days, and $7.8$ days). From top to bottom, we show the baryon density $\rho$, medium temperature $T$, the $^{14}$N abundance by mass, and the $3\alpha$ energy generation rate per unit mass. The inset of the bottom panel displays the energy generation rate in the proximity of $t_{\rm{peak}}$.
  • Figure 3: Evolution of several physical quantities in the He-burning region, defined through Eq. \ref{['eq:Qav']}. From top to bottom, we show $\rho$, $T$, $X_{^{14}{\rm N}}$, the mass coordinate ($m$), the width of the relevant mass region ($\delta m$), and the radial coordinate $R$. The colored asterisks mark the snapshots shown in Fig. \ref{['fig:profiles']}, except for the pre-ignition profile at $-3000$ years.
  • Figure 4: Evolution of $^{18}$F neutrino emission for our $1\,M_\odot$ model. Top panel: Production by the two channels and their sum. The vertical lines indicate $t_{\rm peak}$ (corresponding to the maximum of $L_{3\alpha}$) and the maximum of neutrino emission from EC. Bottom panel: Fractional contributions of $\beta^+$ decay and EC. At early times, EC dominates the neutrino emission rate; after the He flash, $\beta^+$ decay emission becomes the dominant process.
  • Figure 5: Evolution of $^{18}$F neutrino emission from EC for our model with mass of $1\,M_\odot$. Top panel: Emission rate, identical to the orange line of Fig. \ref{['fig:emissionbetaec']}, now on a linear scale and centered on its maximum. Middle panel: Cumulative distribution relative to $t_{\nu\ \rm{EC\ peak}}$. Bottom panel: Cumulative rates divided by $\sqrt{|t|}$, with the maxima indicated by vertical lines. The maxima of $N_{1,2}/\sqrt{t_{1,2}}$ arise at $\tilde{t}_1=-0.96$ days and $\tilde{t}_2=2.15$ days, marked by vertical lines. The optimal window for neutrino searches is given by $\tau=\tilde{t}_2-\tilde{t}_1=3.11$ days.
  • ...and 2 more figures