Common overlattices in trees and trees with fins
Sam Shepherd
TL;DR
This work investigates whether Bass–Kulkarni’s overlattice phenomenon for uniform lattices in $\operatorname{Aut}(T)$ extends to trees with fins. It develops generalized universal groups $U^{(l)}(F)$ via a $\tau$-legal edge labelling $l$ and a subgroup $F<S_n$, establishing a universal property that any vertex-transitive subgroup embeds into some $U^{(l)}(F)$ with local action $F$. The paper then constructs counterexamples in trees and trees with fins, showing pairs of free lattices with no common overlattice in $\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbf{X})$, thus evidencing a breakdown of the Bass–Kulkarni-type overlattice result beyond ordinary trees. In contrast, when labellings are legal, a lattice $\Lambda^{(l)}(F)$ exists containing a conjugate of every free uniform lattice in $U^{(l)}(F)$, recovering a version of the original theorem; this is transported to a tree with fins via a subdivision $T^*$ with $\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbf{T^*})\cong U^{(l)}(F)$. The results reveal a sharp dichotomy: nonexistence of common overlattices in general trees with fins, versus guaranteed overlattices in the legal universal-group setting, and they raise natural questions about when such overlattice phenomena occur.
Abstract
Bass and Kulkarni proved that any pair of free uniform lattices in the automorphism group of a tree have conjugates that both lie inside a third uniform lattice (which is not necessarily free). We show that this does not generalise to trees with fins. The construction of our counter-example involves working with a certain generalisation of the universal groups of Burger and Mozes.
