Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Magnetic fluctuations driven by quantum geometry

Makoto Shimizu, Chang-guen Oh, Youichi Yanase

Abstract

Using quantum distance, magnetic susceptibility in the non-interacting limit can be rigorously split into two contributions: one arising solely from band dispersion, while the other stems from quantum geometric contributions. In this Letter, we apply this decomposition to two materials, LaFeAsO and Pb$_9$Cu(PO$_4$)$_6$O, and demonstrate that their dominant magnetic fluctuations originate from the geometric contribution. In LaFeAsO, stripe-type antiferromagnetic fluctuations arise primarily from quantum geometry, while in Pb$_9$Cu(PO$_4$)$_6$O the geometric term suppresses antiferromagnetic fluctuations and stabilizes ferromagnetic fluctuations. Our findings highlight the essential role of quantum geometry in governing magnetic fluctuations in multi-band systems, and provide a unique and quantitative framework to disentangle band-structure and wavefunction-geometry effects that have often been discussed collectively as multi-orbital effects.

Magnetic fluctuations driven by quantum geometry

Abstract

Using quantum distance, magnetic susceptibility in the non-interacting limit can be rigorously split into two contributions: one arising solely from band dispersion, while the other stems from quantum geometric contributions. In this Letter, we apply this decomposition to two materials, LaFeAsO and PbCu(PO)O, and demonstrate that their dominant magnetic fluctuations originate from the geometric contribution. In LaFeAsO, stripe-type antiferromagnetic fluctuations arise primarily from quantum geometry, while in PbCu(PO)O the geometric term suppresses antiferromagnetic fluctuations and stabilizes ferromagnetic fluctuations. Our findings highlight the essential role of quantum geometry in governing magnetic fluctuations in multi-band systems, and provide a unique and quantitative framework to disentangle band-structure and wavefunction-geometry effects that have often been discussed collectively as multi-orbital effects.
Paper Structure (5 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 5 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Band structure (left) and Fermi surface (right) of LaFeAsO. Colors show the orbital weights of Fe $3d_{xy}$ (red), $3d_{yz}$ (green), $3d_{z^2}$ (blue), $3d_{xz}$ (navy) and $3d_{x^2-y^2}$ (yellow).
  • Figure 2: (a) The static spin susceptibility, (b) the band term and (c) the geometric term for LaFeAsO at $T = 116\mathrm{\;K}$.
  • Figure 3: Band structure (left) and Fermi surface (right) of Pb9Cu(PO4)6O. The Fermi surface is displayed for the chemical potential, $\mu = 10 \mathrm{\;meV}$. Orange (blue) indicates high (low) Fermi velocity as determined by the FPLO calculation.
  • Figure 4: Static irreducible susceptibility of electron doped Pb9Cu(PO4)6O ($\mu = 10\mathrm{\;meV}$) at $T = 116\mathrm{\;K}$. Total susceptibility $\chi^0$ (left), the band term $\chi^0_\mathrm{band}$ (middle) and the geometric term $\chi^0_\mathrm{geom}$ (right) are plotted. Cuts through $q_z = 0$ (top), $q_z = \pi/2c$ (middle) and $q_z = \pi/c$ (bottom) are shown.
  • Figure 5: Static spin susceptibility $\chi^\mathrm{s}(\bm{q})$ calculated within RPA. (a) LaFeAsO for onsite Coulomb interaction parameters $U = 0.8\mathrm{\;eV}$, $V = U/2$, and $J = J' = U/4$ at $T = 116\mathrm{\;K}$, showing a pronounced peak at $\bm{Q} = (\frac{1}{2}, 0)$. (b-d) Pb9Cu(PO4)6O ($\mu = 10\mathrm{\;meV}$) for $U = 100\mathrm{\;meV}$, $V = U/2$, and $J = J' = U/4$ at $T = 116\mathrm{\;K}$, showing $\chi^\mathrm{s}(\bm{q})$ for $q_z =0$, $\pi/2c$, and $\pi/c$, respectively. A ferromagnetic peak at $\bm{Q} = (0, 0, 0)$ is enhanced, while antiferromagnetic fluctuations are suppressed.