Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Nonlocal logistics and nonlinear productions in an attraction-repulsion chemotaxis model: analysis of the global well-posedness

Rafael Díaz Fuentes, María Victoria Redondo Neble, Giuseppe Viglialoro

Abstract

This paper investigates a {three-component} chemotaxis system involving both attraction and repulsion effects, as well as a nonlocal logistic-type source term. Mathematically, if $u=u(x,t)$, $v = v(x,t)$ and $w = w(x,t)$ denote the cell distribution, and the attractive and the repulsive chemical signals, the model is then described by \begin{equation*} \begin{cases} u_t = Δu - χ\nabla \cdot (u \nabla v) + ξ\nabla \cdot (u \nabla w) + a u^α- b u^α\int_Ωu^β, & x \in Ω, \ t > 0, τv_t = Δv - v + f(u), & x \in Ω, \ t > 0, τw_t = Δw - w + g(u), & x \in Ω, \ t > 0. \end{cases} \end{equation*} Here, $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ ($n \geq 1$) is a bounded smooth domain, $τ\in\{0,1\}$, $a,b,α,β,χ,ξ>0$, the production functions $f(u)$ and $g(u)$ are assumed to satisfy algebraic growth conditions of order $\ell$ and $ρ$, generalizing prototypes of the form $u^\ell$ and $u^ρ$, $\ell,ρ>0$. The work is devoted to proving the global existence and boundedness of classical solutions under a suitable balance between the signal production exponents $\ell, ρ$ and the nonlocal damping exponents $α, β$, for regular enough initial data and zero-flux boundary restrictions. In this regard, two main theorems are established for the cases where the chemical signals satisfy either elliptic ($τ=0$) or parabolic ($τ=1$) partial differential equations, highlighting how sufficiently strong nonlocal damping prevents the formation of singularities in time. We extend the results obtained in [Chiyo et al., Appl. Math. Optim. 89:9 (2024)], where the fully parabolic ($τ=1$) and only attraction version is studied. In our context, we establish well-posedness of the system and the long-time behavior of solutions.

Nonlocal logistics and nonlinear productions in an attraction-repulsion chemotaxis model: analysis of the global well-posedness

Abstract

This paper investigates a {three-component} chemotaxis system involving both attraction and repulsion effects, as well as a nonlocal logistic-type source term. Mathematically, if , and denote the cell distribution, and the attractive and the repulsive chemical signals, the model is then described by \begin{equation*} \begin{cases} u_t = Δu - χ\nabla \cdot (u \nabla v) + ξ\nabla \cdot (u \nabla w) + a u^α- b u^α\int_Ωu^β, & x \in Ω, \ t > 0, τv_t = Δv - v + f(u), & x \in Ω, \ t > 0, τw_t = Δw - w + g(u), & x \in Ω, \ t > 0. \end{cases} \end{equation*} Here, () is a bounded smooth domain, , , the production functions and are assumed to satisfy algebraic growth conditions of order and , generalizing prototypes of the form and , . The work is devoted to proving the global existence and boundedness of classical solutions under a suitable balance between the signal production exponents and the nonlocal damping exponents , for regular enough initial data and zero-flux boundary restrictions. In this regard, two main theorems are established for the cases where the chemical signals satisfy either elliptic () or parabolic () partial differential equations, highlighting how sufficiently strong nonlocal damping prevents the formation of singularities in time. We extend the results obtained in [Chiyo et al., Appl. Math. Optim. 89:9 (2024)], where the fully parabolic () and only attraction version is studied. In our context, we establish well-posedness of the system and the long-time behavior of solutions.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 13 theorems, 46 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 13 theorems, 46 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For $\tau=0$, let us require the conditions in eq:modelCond and eq:fg. Then, whenever either are complied, it holds that problem eq:model admits a unique nonnegative solution

Theorems & Definitions (31)

  • Theorem 1.1: Parabolic-Elliptic model
  • Remark 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3: Fully Parabolic model
  • Remark 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Remark 2.1: Notation
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3: Parabolic Regularity
  • proof
  • ...and 21 more