OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage
Akshat Naik, Jay Culligan, Yarin Gal, Philip Torr, Rahaf Aljundi, Alasdair Paren, Adel Bibi
TL;DR
The paper addresses data leakage risks in orchestrator-based multi-agent systems by introducing OMNI-LEAK, a red-team attack that coordinates a Data Processing Agent using SQL and a Notification Agent within an orchestrator. The authors formalize the threat model, develop a data-leak benchmark across Toy/Medium/Big databases with public and private data sources $D_{pub}$ and $D_{priv}$, and evaluate five frontier LLMs using metrics such as $BA$, $RA$, and $E$ (the expected number of queries for a successful attack). They find that all models except Claude-sonnet-4 are vulnerable to at least one OMNI-LEAK variant, with database size having little effect on attack success and downstream exposure often driving vulnerability. The work highlights practical privacy risks in real-world data-management orchestrators and calls for safety research and defense-in-depth strategies, including monitoring at multiple stages and human oversight to mitigate such attacks in deployment.
Abstract
As Large Language Model (LLM) agents become more capable, their coordinated use in the form of multi-agent systems is anticipated to emerge as a practical paradigm. Prior work has examined the safety and misuse risks associated with agents. However, much of this has focused on the single-agent case and/or setups missing basic engineering safeguards such as access control, revealing a scarcity of threat modeling in multi-agent systems. We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup, in which a central agent decomposes and delegates tasks to specialized agents. Through red-teaming a concrete setup representative of a likely future use case, we demonstrate a novel attack vector, OMNI-LEAK, that compromises several agents to leak sensitive data through a single indirect prompt injection, even in the \textit{presence of data access control}. We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable, even when the attacker lacks insider knowledge of the implementation details. Our work highlights the importance of safety research to generalize from single-agent to multi-agent settings, in order to reduce the serious risks of real-world privacy breaches and financial losses and overall public trust in AI agents.
