Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Parametrized equivalence relation on the global class of morphisms of a category and frame-theoretic examples

Nizar El Idrissi

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of defining morphism equivalence beyond symmetry-based group actions by proposing a parametrized, higher-categorical notion of equivalence on the global class of morphisms. This is implemented by a construction that uses data $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{D},\sigma,\tau_1,\tau_2)$ and 1- and 2-morphisms in a $2$-category to relate $m:A\to B$ and $\tilde{m}:\tilde{A}\to \tilde{B}$, with reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity established. Two concrete instantiations are shown to fit into the framework: (i) group-action equivalence, recovering classical notions, and (ii) a coarse invariant-based equivalence for Bessel functions based on the pointwise norm of the analysis operator $\rho(f)=\|T_f(\cdot)\|_{L^2}$; these illustrate how invariants can supplement, or replace, symmetry in classification. The contributions provide a unifying language for comparing frames and morphisms via higher-categorical observables, potentially guiding a categorical invariant theory for frames and continuous frames. Future directions include characterizing equivalence classes under the coarse invariant and extending the framework to Banach-space settings.

Abstract

We introduce an equivalence relation on the global class of morphisms of a category that extends several classical notions of equivalence in mathematics. We show that the standard group-action equivalence is a special case of our framework. A more interesting example is provided by an equivalence relation defined on the class of Bessel families and based on a coarse invariant that is the pointwise norm of the analysis operator of the Bessel family -- this is also a special case of our framework, and the formalism developed here can be seen as a first step toward a categorical invariant theory for Bessel families and continuous frames.

Parametrized equivalence relation on the global class of morphisms of a category and frame-theoretic examples

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of defining morphism equivalence beyond symmetry-based group actions by proposing a parametrized, higher-categorical notion of equivalence on the global class of morphisms. This is implemented by a construction that uses data and 1- and 2-morphisms in a -category to relate and , with reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity established. Two concrete instantiations are shown to fit into the framework: (i) group-action equivalence, recovering classical notions, and (ii) a coarse invariant-based equivalence for Bessel functions based on the pointwise norm of the analysis operator ; these illustrate how invariants can supplement, or replace, symmetry in classification. The contributions provide a unifying language for comparing frames and morphisms via higher-categorical observables, potentially guiding a categorical invariant theory for frames and continuous frames. Future directions include characterizing equivalence classes under the coarse invariant and extending the framework to Banach-space settings.

Abstract

We introduce an equivalence relation on the global class of morphisms of a category that extends several classical notions of equivalence in mathematics. We show that the standard group-action equivalence is a special case of our framework. A more interesting example is provided by an equivalence relation defined on the class of Bessel families and based on a coarse invariant that is the pointwise norm of the analysis operator of the Bessel family -- this is also a special case of our framework, and the formalism developed here can be seen as a first step toward a categorical invariant theory for Bessel families and continuous frames.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 5 theorems, 38 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 5 theorems, 38 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.3

$\simeq$ is an equivalence relation.

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Definition 3.1: Group-action equivalence
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Example 3.3: Example of a group-action equivalence
  • Definition 3.4: Operatorial equivalence in varying $\mathsf{\mathcal{B}}(\Omega,H)$
  • Remark 3.5
  • ...and 6 more