Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On some convergence approach structures on hyperspaces

M. Ateş, F. Mynard, S. Sağıroğlu

TL;DR

The paper develops convergence-hyperspace structures for Cap spaces and their relation to convergence spaces, introducing upper and lower Kuratowski convergences and Fell-type topologies in the Cap framework. It shows that over an approach space, the lower Kuratowski convergence structure coincides with the $\vee$-Vietoris construction, while distinguishing a non-Archimedean upper-Fell structure that sits between the upper Kuratowski and earlier Fell-type structures. The Conv (coreflection) and Conv (reflection) correspondences tie $\lambda_{lK}$ to $c(\lambda)$ and $\lambda_{uK}$ to $r(\lambda)$, with topological reductions recovering classical Kuratowski convergence in the topological case. The work provides a Cap abstraction of results like: if the upper Kuratowski convergence over a topological space is pretopological, then it is topological, and it sets the stage for comparing when various hyperspace convergences coincide or differ in non-topological settings. Overall, this extends hyperspace convergence theory to the Cap setting, clarifying how coreflection/reflection influence Kuratowski and Fell constructions and offering a unified treatment across convergence- and approach-space frameworks.

Abstract

In the context of the category $\mathsf{Cap}$ of convergence approach spaces and contractions, we introduce and study approach analogs of the upper and lower Kuratowski convergences, upper-Fell and Fell topologies on the set of closed subsets of the coreflection on the category $\mathsf{Conv}$ of convergence spaces of a convergence approach space. In particular, over a pre-approach space, the $\mathsf{Conv}$-coreflection of the lower Kuratowski convergence approach structure is the lower Kuratowski convergence associated with the $\mathsf{Conv}$-coreflection of the base space, while the $\mathsf{Conv}$-reflection is the lower Kuratowski convergence associated with the $\mathsf{Conv}$-reflection. The $\mathsf{Conv}$-coreflection of the upper Kuratowski convergence approach is is the upper Kuratowski convergence associated with the $\mathsf{Conv}$-reflection of the base space, while the $\mathsf{Conv}$-reflection is the upper Kuratowski convergence associated with the $\mathsf{Conv}$-coreflection of the base space. We show that, over an approach space, the lower Kuratowski convergence approach structure is in fact an approach structure that coincides with the $\vee$-Vietoris approach structure introduced by Lowen and his collaborators, though it may be strictly finer over a general convergence approach space. We show that the upper Fell convergence approach structure is a non-Archimedean approach structure coarser than the upper Kuratowski convergence approach, but finer than the upper Fell approach structure introduced by the first and third author. We also obtain a $\mathsf{Cap}$ abstraction of the classical result that if the upper Kuratowski convergence over a topological space is pretopological, then it is also topological.

On some convergence approach structures on hyperspaces

TL;DR

The paper develops convergence-hyperspace structures for Cap spaces and their relation to convergence spaces, introducing upper and lower Kuratowski convergences and Fell-type topologies in the Cap framework. It shows that over an approach space, the lower Kuratowski convergence structure coincides with the -Vietoris construction, while distinguishing a non-Archimedean upper-Fell structure that sits between the upper Kuratowski and earlier Fell-type structures. The Conv (coreflection) and Conv (reflection) correspondences tie to and to , with topological reductions recovering classical Kuratowski convergence in the topological case. The work provides a Cap abstraction of results like: if the upper Kuratowski convergence over a topological space is pretopological, then it is topological, and it sets the stage for comparing when various hyperspace convergences coincide or differ in non-topological settings. Overall, this extends hyperspace convergence theory to the Cap setting, clarifying how coreflection/reflection influence Kuratowski and Fell constructions and offering a unified treatment across convergence- and approach-space frameworks.

Abstract

In the context of the category of convergence approach spaces and contractions, we introduce and study approach analogs of the upper and lower Kuratowski convergences, upper-Fell and Fell topologies on the set of closed subsets of the coreflection on the category of convergence spaces of a convergence approach space. In particular, over a pre-approach space, the -coreflection of the lower Kuratowski convergence approach structure is the lower Kuratowski convergence associated with the -coreflection of the base space, while the -reflection is the lower Kuratowski convergence associated with the -reflection. The -coreflection of the upper Kuratowski convergence approach is is the upper Kuratowski convergence associated with the -reflection of the base space, while the -reflection is the upper Kuratowski convergence associated with the -coreflection of the base space. We show that, over an approach space, the lower Kuratowski convergence approach structure is in fact an approach structure that coincides with the -Vietoris approach structure introduced by Lowen and his collaborators, though it may be strictly finer over a general convergence approach space. We show that the upper Fell convergence approach structure is a non-Archimedean approach structure coarser than the upper Kuratowski convergence approach, but finer than the upper Fell approach structure introduced by the first and third author. We also obtain a abstraction of the classical result that if the upper Kuratowski convergence over a topological space is pretopological, then it is also topological.
Paper Structure (6 sections, 23 theorems, 154 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 23 theorems, 154 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2

If $X$ is a topological space, $\mathfrak{F}\in\mathbb{F}(\mathcal{C}_{X})$, and $B\in\mathcal{C}_{X}$ then Moreover, if $\mathfrak{F}$ is a saturated filter and $\mathcal{H}$ is a saturated subset of $\mathcal{C}_{X}$, then On the other hand,

Theorems & Definitions (54)

  • Definition 1
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3
  • proof
  • Proposition 4
  • proof
  • Remark 5
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • ...and 44 more