What if Agents Could Imagine? Reinforcing Open-Vocabulary HOI Comprehension through Generation
Zhenlong Yuan, Xiangyan Qu, Jing Tang, Rui Chen, Lei Sun, Ruidong Chen, Hongwei Yu, Chengxuan Qian, Xiangxiang Chu, Shuo Li, Yuyin Zhou
TL;DR
The paper tackles open-vocabulary HOI detection by addressing perceptual-cognitive gaps, cross-modal hallucination, and occlusion. It introduces ImagineAgent, an agentic framework that blends cognitive mapping, tool augmentation, and generative imagination within a reinforcement learning loop to robustly reason about HOIs. A two-stage workflow, augmented with a data-collection pipeline for structured reasoning chains and the GRPO-based policy optimization, yields state-of-the-art results on SWIG-HOI and HICO-DET with roughly 20% of the training data required by prior methods. This work advances open-vocabulary visual reasoning by tightly integrating perception, external knowledge tools, and imagined viewpoints, with potential to extend to broader tasks and more extensive tool libraries.
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models have shown promising capabilities in bridging visual and textual reasoning, yet their reasoning capabilities in Open-Vocabulary Human-Object Interaction (OV-HOI) are limited by cross-modal hallucinations and occlusion-induced ambiguity. To address this, we propose \textbf{ImagineAgent}, an agentic framework that harmonizes cognitive reasoning with generative imagination for robust visual understanding. Specifically, our method innovatively constructs cognitive maps that explicitly model plausible relationships between detected entities and candidate actions. Subsequently, it dynamically invokes tools including retrieval augmentation, image cropping, and diffusion models to gather domain-specific knowledge and enriched visual evidence, thereby achieving cross-modal alignment in ambiguous scenarios. Moreover, we propose a composite reward that balances prediction accuracy and tool efficiency. Evaluations on SWIG-HOI and HICO-DET datasets demonstrate our SOTA performance, requiring approximately 20\% of training data compared to existing methods, validating our robustness and efficiency.
