Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Collison of Orbits on an Elliptic Surface

Dragos Ghioca, Negin Shadgar

TL;DR

This work analyzes collisions of orbits on fibers of an elliptic surface, characterizing when there are infinitely many base points λ for which a target point Q lies in both generated orbits of P_1 and P_2 under End(E). It gives a precise, CM-sensitive criterion: either a global relation [k](P_i)=Q, a shared End(E)-relation [k_1](P_1)=[k_2](P_2), or, in the CM case, a triple α_1,α_2,β in the endomorphism ring with α_1/α_2 not rational such that [α_1](P_1)=[α_2](P_2)=[β](Q). The argument combines unlikely-intersection philosophy with CM-arithmetic tools, using Betti-coordinates and endomorphism dynamics to move from fiberwise statements to global relations, and then proves the converse by case analysis, including CM refinements. The results extend the Masser–Zannier/DeMarco–Mavraki paradigm to a collision-of-orbits setting for elliptic curves, providing a complete description of when infinite base points yield a shared orbit membership across fibers. This advances understanding of arithmetic dynamics in families of elliptic curves and highlights the distinct role of complex multiplication in orbit-collision phenomena.

Abstract

Let $C$ be a smooth projective curve defined over $\Qbar$, let $π:\mathcal{E}\lra C$ be an elliptic surface and let $σ_{P_1},σ_{P_2},σ_{Q}$ be sections of $π$ (corresponding to points $P_1,P_2, Q$ of the generic fiber $E$ of $\mathcal{E}$). We obtain a precise characterization, expressed solely in terms of the dynamical relations between the points $P_1,P_2,Q$ with respect to the endomorphism ring of $E$, so that there exist infinitely many $ł\in C(\Qbar)$ with the property that for some nonzero integers $m_{1,ł},m_{2,ł}$, we have that $[m_{i,ł}](σ_{P_{i}}(ł))=σ_{Q}(ł)$ (for $i=1,2$) on the smooth fiber $E_ł$ of $\mathcal{E}$.

Collison of Orbits on an Elliptic Surface

TL;DR

This work analyzes collisions of orbits on fibers of an elliptic surface, characterizing when there are infinitely many base points λ for which a target point Q lies in both generated orbits of P_1 and P_2 under End(E). It gives a precise, CM-sensitive criterion: either a global relation [k](P_i)=Q, a shared End(E)-relation [k_1](P_1)=[k_2](P_2), or, in the CM case, a triple α_1,α_2,β in the endomorphism ring with α_1/α_2 not rational such that [α_1](P_1)=[α_2](P_2)=[β](Q). The argument combines unlikely-intersection philosophy with CM-arithmetic tools, using Betti-coordinates and endomorphism dynamics to move from fiberwise statements to global relations, and then proves the converse by case analysis, including CM refinements. The results extend the Masser–Zannier/DeMarco–Mavraki paradigm to a collision-of-orbits setting for elliptic curves, providing a complete description of when infinite base points yield a shared orbit membership across fibers. This advances understanding of arithmetic dynamics in families of elliptic curves and highlights the distinct role of complex multiplication in orbit-collision phenomena.

Abstract

Let be a smooth projective curve defined over , let be an elliptic surface and let be sections of (corresponding to points of the generic fiber of ). We obtain a precise characterization, expressed solely in terms of the dynamical relations between the points with respect to the endomorphism ring of , so that there exist infinitely many with the property that for some nonzero integers , we have that (for ) on the smooth fiber of .
Paper Structure (12 sections, 15 theorems, 42 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 15 theorems, 42 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $C$ be a smooth projective curve defined over ${\overline{\mathbb Q}}$, let $\mathcal{E}\longrightarrow C$ be an elliptic surface and let $P_1,P_2, Q\in E({\overline{\mathbb Q}}(C))$ be non-torsion points on the generic fiber $E$ of $\pi$. Furthermore, if $\mathcal{E}$ is isotrivial, then not a

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • ...and 19 more