Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hunting for Directed 2-Spiders

Grzegorz Gutowski, Gaurav Kucheriya

TL;DR

The paper proves, for every integer $l \ge 1$, that any directed graph with minimum out-degree at least $2l$ contains a $(2,l)$-spider as a subgraph, resolving the previously conjectured bound and matching a tight example given by the complete digraph on $2l$ vertices. The authors introduce extender-based techniques and a greedy extension lemma to iteratively grow a rooted $(2,l)$-spider, and they additionally provide an almost-linear-time algorithm that constructs such a spider in any suitable directed graph. The approach combines a careful partition of vertices by in-degree, an extension framework, and an edge-coloring step (via a Vizing-style bound) on an auxiliary graph to obtain large disjoint 2-paths that can be assembled into the target spider. These results settle the $k=2$ case of the Giant Spider Conjecture for directed graphs, and they lay the groundwork for extending the method to general $(k,l)$-spiders and to oriented graphs.

Abstract

Hons, Klimošová, Kucheriya, Mikšaník, Tkadlec, and Tyomkyn proved that, for every integer $\ell \ge 1$, every directed graph with minimum out-degree at least $3.23 \cdot \ell$ contains a $(2,\ell)$-spider (a $1$-subdivision of the in-star with $\ell$ leaves) as a subgraph. They also conjectured that the bound on the minimum out-degree can be further improved to $2 \ell$. In this note, we confirm their conjecture by showing that every directed graph with minimum out-degree at least $2\ell$ contains a $(2, \ell)$-spider as a subgraph. This result is best possible, as the complete directed graph with $2\ell$ vertices does not contain a $(2,\ell)$-spider.

Hunting for Directed 2-Spiders

TL;DR

The paper proves, for every integer , that any directed graph with minimum out-degree at least contains a -spider as a subgraph, resolving the previously conjectured bound and matching a tight example given by the complete digraph on vertices. The authors introduce extender-based techniques and a greedy extension lemma to iteratively grow a rooted -spider, and they additionally provide an almost-linear-time algorithm that constructs such a spider in any suitable directed graph. The approach combines a careful partition of vertices by in-degree, an extension framework, and an edge-coloring step (via a Vizing-style bound) on an auxiliary graph to obtain large disjoint 2-paths that can be assembled into the target spider. These results settle the case of the Giant Spider Conjecture for directed graphs, and they lay the groundwork for extending the method to general -spiders and to oriented graphs.

Abstract

Hons, Klimošová, Kucheriya, Mikšaník, Tkadlec, and Tyomkyn proved that, for every integer , every directed graph with minimum out-degree at least contains a -spider (a -subdivision of the in-star with leaves) as a subgraph. They also conjectured that the bound on the minimum out-degree can be further improved to . In this note, we confirm their conjecture by showing that every directed graph with minimum out-degree at least contains a -spider as a subgraph. This result is best possible, as the complete directed graph with vertices does not contain a -spider.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 3 theorems, 1 equation, 1 figure)

This paper contains 4 sections, 3 theorems, 1 equation, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 2

For every integer $\ell \geqslant 1$, every directed graph with minimum out-degree at least $2\ell$ contains a $(2, \ell)$-spider as a subgraph.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: A $(2,4)$-spider rooted at $r$.

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Conjecture 1: Giant Spider Conjecture hons2025unavoidable
  • Theorem 2
  • Lemma 3
  • Corollary 4