Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On supersaturation in the Erdős--Sós problem

Andrey Kupavskii, Yakov Shubin

TL;DR

This work investigates the supersaturation phenomenon for the Erdős–Sós problem on $k$-subsets of $[n]$ avoiding exact intersections of size $t$. By deploying the Delta-system (sunflower) method, together with Füredi’s structural theorems and Kruskal–Katona-type shadow lemmas, the authors determine the asymptotic order of the minimum number $\\rho(\\ell)$ of $t$-intersecting pairs in an $\\ell$-vertex family for fixed $k,t$ as $n\to\infty$, and identify exact values in several regimes. They establish an upper bound from averaging and derive sharp lower bounds, with a key threshold at the extremal size $\\alpha(G(n,k,t))$, where the random-pair expectation becomes the correct benchmark up to constants. The paper also presents two extremal constructions illustrating tightness and provides exact values of $\\rho(l)$ near the extremal size under small additive increments $r$, including a precise regime where $\\rho(l)=r\binom{k}{t}\binom{n-k-t-1}{k-2t-1}$. These results deepen understanding of supersaturation in the Erdős–Sós framework and highlight the rich structure of almost-extremal families in uniform intersection problems.

Abstract

The following classical question in extremal set theory is due to Erd\H os and Sós: what is the size of the largest family $\mathcal F\subset {[n]\choose k}$ with no two sets $F_1,F_2\in \mathcal F$ such that $|F_1\cap F_2| = t$? In this paper, we address a supersaturation question for this extremal function. For a family $\mathcal F\subset {[n]\choose k}$ of a fixed size $\ell$, what is the smallest number of pairs $F_1,F_2\in \mathcal F$ with $|F_1\cap F_2|=t$ it may induce? For fixed $k$ and $n\to \infty$, we find the exact threshold when the minimum number of pairs matches the expected number of pairs in a random $\ell$-element family up to a constant factor. We also find an exact answer for $\ell$ slightly above the extremal function.

On supersaturation in the Erdős--Sós problem

TL;DR

This work investigates the supersaturation phenomenon for the Erdős–Sós problem on -subsets of avoiding exact intersections of size . By deploying the Delta-system (sunflower) method, together with Füredi’s structural theorems and Kruskal–Katona-type shadow lemmas, the authors determine the asymptotic order of the minimum number of -intersecting pairs in an -vertex family for fixed as , and identify exact values in several regimes. They establish an upper bound from averaging and derive sharp lower bounds, with a key threshold at the extremal size , where the random-pair expectation becomes the correct benchmark up to constants. The paper also presents two extremal constructions illustrating tightness and provides exact values of near the extremal size under small additive increments , including a precise regime where . These results deepen understanding of supersaturation in the Erdős–Sós framework and highlight the rich structure of almost-extremal families in uniform intersection problems.

Abstract

The following classical question in extremal set theory is due to Erd\H os and Sós: what is the size of the largest family with no two sets such that ? In this paper, we address a supersaturation question for this extremal function. For a family of a fixed size , what is the smallest number of pairs with it may induce? For fixed and , we find the exact threshold when the minimum number of pairs matches the expected number of pairs in a random -element family up to a constant factor. We also find an exact answer for slightly above the extremal function.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 8 theorems, 84 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 8 theorems, 84 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

(i) Fix positive integers $k,t$ with $k > 2t+1$. There exists $n_0$ such that for $n > n_0$ (ii) Fix positive integers $k,t$ with $k \leqslant 2t+1$. Then

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Theorem 1: Frankl and Füredi, FF
  • Claim 2
  • proof
  • Claim 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Theorem 6
  • Theorem 7
  • Theorem 8
  • Lemma 9
  • ...and 13 more