Risk-Equalized Differentially Private Synthetic Data: Protecting Outliers by Controlling Record-Level Influence
Amir Asiaee, Chao Yan, Zachary B. Abrams, Bradley A. Malin
TL;DR
This work addresses the unequal privacy risk faced by outliers in differentially private synthetic data by proposing risk-equalized DP synthesis (REPS). It combines a private outlier scorer with a risk-weighted learning stage, ensuring that high-risk records contribute less to the learned generator, thereby tightening per-record privacy bounds under Gaussian mechanisms while maintaining overall DP guarantees. Theoretical results connect record-level influence to per-instance privacy, and experiments on simulated and real tabular datasets show reductions in top-decile membership inference risk and varied utility effects depending on scorer quality and dataset. The approach offers a practical mechanism to improve privacy equity in synthetic data releases, with applicability to DP-SGD and broader data-sharing contexts, though performance is dataset-dependent and sensitive to scorer accuracy.
Abstract
When synthetic data is released, some individuals are harder to protect than others. A patient with a rare disease combination or a transaction with unusual characteristics stands out from the crowd. Differential privacy provides worst-case guarantees, but empirical attacks -- particularly membership inference -- succeed far more often against such outliers, especially under moderate privacy budgets and with auxiliary information. This paper introduces risk-equalized DP synthesis, a framework that prioritizes protection for high-risk records by reducing their influence on the learned generator. The mechanism operates in two stages: first, a small privacy budget estimates each record's "outlierness"; second, a DP learning procedure weights each record inversely to its risk score. Under Gaussian mechanisms, a record's privacy loss is proportional to its influence on the output -- so deliberately shrinking outliers' contributions yields tighter per-instance privacy bounds for precisely those records that need them most. We prove end-to-end DP guarantees via composition and derive closed-form per-record bounds for the synthesis stage (the scoring stage adds a uniform per-record term). Experiments on simulated data with controlled outlier injection show that risk-weighting substantially reduces membership inference success against high-outlierness records; ablations confirm that targeting -- not random downweighting -- drives the improvement. On real-world benchmarks (Breast Cancer, Adult, German Credit), gains are dataset-dependent, highlighting the interplay between scorer quality and synthesis pipeline.
