$p$-adic symplectic geometry of integrable systems and Weierstrass-Williamson theory II
Luis Crespo, Álvaro Pelayo
TL;DR
This work delivers a comprehensive algebraic/arithmetic treatment of the Weierstrass-Williamson-type classification for $p$-adic symmetric matrices under congruence by symplectic transformations. By lifting problems to algebraically closed fields, exploiting Jordan bases and DSq/Hilbert-symbol machinery, and then constraining back to $\mathbb{Q}_p$, the authors obtain explicit normal forms in dimensions 2 and 4, with detailed case distinctions for $p\neq2$ and $p=2$, and extend the framework to higher dimensions. The results underpin the $p$-adic local models of integrable systems (CrePel-integrable) and their real counterparts, yielding exact counts of infinite and isolated normal form families, asymptotic growth in dimension, and concrete applications to classical mechanical systems such as the Jaynes-Cummings model. The approach reveals both similarities and crucial differences with the real theory, highlights the role of field extensions in the $p$-adic setting, and provides a scalable blueprint for analyzing $p$-adic integrable systems through their linearized (quadratic) constituents.
Abstract
This paper is a sequel to arXiv:2501.14444, in which we shall give proofs of several results stated in arXiv:2501.14444 (Theorems D--L) which, for brevity and clarity, we postponed to this sequel paper. These results were the following: for any prime number $p$, first we show that every $2$-by-$2$ symmetric matrix with coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}_p$ can be reduced to a canonical form, and we give the exact numbers of families of normal forms with one parameter and of isolated normal forms, which depend on $p$. Then we make the same analysis for $4$-by-$4$ matrices. We also prove that, for higher size, the number of families of normal forms of matrices, even in the non-degenerate case, grows almost exponentially with the size. The paper can be read independently of arXiv:2501.14444 as we recall the statements of arXiv:2501.14444 that we shall prove here. The statements and proofs of the present paper are of an algebraic and arithmetical nature, and rely mainly on Galois theory of $p$-adic extension fields.
