Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the geometry of the second Lagrange spectra

Hao Cheng, Harold Erazo, Carlos Gustavo Moreira, Thiago Vasconcelos

TL;DR

The paper examines the geometry of the second Lagrange spectra, $L_2$ and $L_2^*$, through a dynamical lens and establishes a stark contrast between their dimension-theoretic properties. It derives explicit continued-fraction–based formulas for $k_2(\alpha)$ and $k_2^*(\alpha)$, then casts the spectra as dynamical Lagrange spectra for a Gauss-type map on a conservative horseshoe, enabling a continuity result for the dimension function $d_2(t)=HD(L_2\cap(-\infty,t))$ while proving a sharp discontinuity for $d_2^*(t)$ at $t=\tfrac{2}{3}$. The authors show that near $2/3$, $L_2^*$ exhibits rich structure driven by Gauss–Cantor constructions, with $d_2^*(\tfrac{2}{3})=0$ but $d_2^*(\tfrac{2}{3}+\varepsilon)=1$ for any $\varepsilon>0$, and provide a lower bound $HD(X(k))>\tfrac12$ for large $k$ to support these results. Overall, the work highlights how non-smoothmax-type observables and Cantor-set dynamics can produce discontinuities in dimension, contrasting with the smooth-case continuity for $L_2$.

Abstract

The Lagrange spectrum $L$ is the set of finite values of the best approximation constants $k(α)=\limsup_{|p|,|q|\to \infty}|q(qα-p)|^{-1}$, where $α\in \mathbb{R}\setminus \mathbb{Q}$. It is a classical result that the pairs $(p,q)$ attaining these approximation constants arise from the convergents $(p_n,q_n)$ of the continued fraction of $α$. Consequently, $k(α)=\limsup_{n\to\infty}|q_n(q_nα-p_n)|^{-1}$. Moreira proved that the function $d(t)=HD(L\cap(-\infty,t))$ where $HD$ denotes Hausdorff dimension, is continuous. Second Lagrange spectra are defined analogously to the classical Lagrange spectrum, but are associated with the problem of approximating an irrational number $α$ by rational numbers $\frac{p}{q}$ that are not convergents of its continued fraction expansion. Two natural definitions arise depending on whether rational multiples $(p,q)=(kp_n,kq_n),k\geq 2$ which represent the same rational numbers as convergents, are allowed or excluded. Based on this distinction, Moshchevitin introduced two second Lagrange spectra, denoted $L_2$ and $L_2^*$. We prove that the function $d_2(t)=HD(L_2\cap (-\infty,t))$ is continuous, whereas $d_2^*(t)=HD(L_2^*\cap (-\infty,t))$ is discontinuous and assumes only the values 0 and 1.

On the geometry of the second Lagrange spectra

TL;DR

The paper examines the geometry of the second Lagrange spectra, and , through a dynamical lens and establishes a stark contrast between their dimension-theoretic properties. It derives explicit continued-fraction–based formulas for and , then casts the spectra as dynamical Lagrange spectra for a Gauss-type map on a conservative horseshoe, enabling a continuity result for the dimension function while proving a sharp discontinuity for at . The authors show that near , exhibits rich structure driven by Gauss–Cantor constructions, with but for any , and provide a lower bound for large to support these results. Overall, the work highlights how non-smoothmax-type observables and Cantor-set dynamics can produce discontinuities in dimension, contrasting with the smooth-case continuity for .

Abstract

The Lagrange spectrum is the set of finite values of the best approximation constants , where . It is a classical result that the pairs attaining these approximation constants arise from the convergents of the continued fraction of . Consequently, . Moreira proved that the function where denotes Hausdorff dimension, is continuous. Second Lagrange spectra are defined analogously to the classical Lagrange spectrum, but are associated with the problem of approximating an irrational number by rational numbers that are not convergents of its continued fraction expansion. Two natural definitions arise depending on whether rational multiples which represent the same rational numbers as convergents, are allowed or excluded. Based on this distinction, Moshchevitin introduced two second Lagrange spectra, denoted and . We prove that the function is continuous, whereas is discontinuous and assumes only the values 0 and 1.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 18 theorems, 141 equations)

This paper contains 15 sections, 18 theorems, 141 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $K,K'$ be $C^2$ regular Cantor sets and suppose that $K$ is non essentially affine. Then, $HD(K+K')=\min\{1,HD(K)+HD(K')\}$.

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Theorem 1.1: Moreira
  • Theorem 1.2: Lima-Moreira-Villamil
  • Lemma 1.3: Moshchevitin
  • Theorem 1.4: Gayfulin
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Corollary 1
  • Lemma 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Lemma 1.8
  • Corollary 2
  • ...and 15 more