Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Gelfand-Kirillov bound for $p$-adic Banach representations with infinitesimal character for $\text{GL}_2$ and quaternion units

Reinier Sorgdrager

TL;DR

The paper proves the sharp bound $ ext{GKdim}( ext{Pi})\le [K:\mathbf Q_p]$ for admissible $L$-Banach representations of $\text{GL}_2K$ or quaternion units $D^ imes$ when the locally analytic vectors admit an infinitesimal character, for $p>2$. The approach blends filtrations on distribution algebras, Lazard’s isomorphism, and a Casimir-ideal annihilation mechanism acting on associated graded modules to control the Krull dimension of the reduction $\mathop{\mathrm{gr}}\overline M$, tying representation-theoretic invariants to Lie-theoretic central elements. The result sharpens previous bounds in the $p$-adic Langlands context and yields optimal bounds in the $ ext{GL}_2$ case, with indications that the method could generalize to higher rank groups. The work also provides a conceptual explanation for the Casimir-like ideals that govern the upper bounds and discusses potential extensions to families and ramified base fields, as well as connections to patched modules in the $p$-adic Langlands program. Overall, the paper advances a structurally transparent route to GK-bounds via infinitesimal characters and graded-center annihilation, offering tools for future generalizations and applications in $p$-adic representation theory.

Abstract

We prove that an admissible $p$-adic Banach representation of $\text{GL}_2K$ whose locally analytic vectors have an infinitesimal character has Gelfand-Kirillov dimension $\leq[K\colon\mathbf Q_p]$, where $p>2$ and $K$ is a $p$-adic field. We also prove this for the group of units of the quaternions over $K$ replacing $\text{GL}_2K$. In the process, we make some observations in the theory of $p$-adic Banach representations that might be of independent interest.

Gelfand-Kirillov bound for $p$-adic Banach representations with infinitesimal character for $\text{GL}_2$ and quaternion units

TL;DR

The paper proves the sharp bound for admissible -Banach representations of or quaternion units when the locally analytic vectors admit an infinitesimal character, for . The approach blends filtrations on distribution algebras, Lazard’s isomorphism, and a Casimir-ideal annihilation mechanism acting on associated graded modules to control the Krull dimension of the reduction , tying representation-theoretic invariants to Lie-theoretic central elements. The result sharpens previous bounds in the -adic Langlands context and yields optimal bounds in the case, with indications that the method could generalize to higher rank groups. The work also provides a conceptual explanation for the Casimir-like ideals that govern the upper bounds and discusses potential extensions to families and ramified base fields, as well as connections to patched modules in the -adic Langlands program. Overall, the paper advances a structurally transparent route to GK-bounds via infinitesimal characters and graded-center annihilation, offering tools for future generalizations and applications in -adic representation theory.

Abstract

We prove that an admissible -adic Banach representation of whose locally analytic vectors have an infinitesimal character has Gelfand-Kirillov dimension , where and is a -adic field. We also prove this for the group of units of the quaternions over replacing . In the process, we make some observations in the theory of -adic Banach representations that might be of independent interest.
Paper Structure (26 sections, 28 theorems, 124 equations)

This paper contains 26 sections, 28 theorems, 124 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $p>2$ and let $K$ and $L$ be $p$-adic fields. Let $\Pi$ be an admissible $L$-Banach space representation of either $\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}\nolimits_2K$ or of $D^\times$, where $D$ are the quaternions over $K$. If the locally analytic vectors of $\Pi$ have an infinitesimal character, then $\Pi$ has

Theorems & Definitions (60)

  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['mainmainthm']}
  • Definition 1.1
  • Remark 2.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.1
  • ...and 50 more