First Extraction of the Matter Radius of $^{132}$Sn via Proton Elastic Scattering at 200 MeV/Nucleon
Y. Hijikata, J. Zenihiro, S. Terashima, Y. Matsuda, H. Sakaguchi, P. Arthuis, T. Miyagi, S. Ota, H. Baba, S. Chebotaryov, M. Dozono, T. Furuno, T. Harada, C. Iwamoto, T. Kawabata, M. Kobayashi, A. J. Krasznahorkay, S. Leblond, T. Lokotko, Y. Maeda, S. Masuoka, M. Matsushita, S. Michimasa, E. Milman, T. Murakami, H. Nasu, J. Okamoto, S. Sakaguchi, M. Takaki, K. Taniue, H. Tokieda, M. Tsumura, O. Wieland, Y. Yamaguchi, Z. H. Yang, R. Yokoyama, T. Uesaka
TL;DR
This work reports the first extraction of the matter radius of $^{132}$Sn from proton elastic scattering at $196$–$210$ MeV/nucleon, spanning momentum transfers $0.80$–$2.1$ fm$^{-1}$. Using a medium-modified relativistic impulse approximation and densities constrained by the ISOLDE charge radius, the authors obtain a matter radius of $\langle r_m^2\rangle^{1/2}=4.758^{+0.023}_{-0.024}$ fm. When compared with ab initio IMSRG densities based on chiral NN+3N interactions, the Delta NNLO GO result provides the best agreement, but no theory simultaneously matches both the matter and charge radii, implying a small neutron skin and a relatively soft symmetry-energy EOS. The findings highlight the ongoing challenge of validating nuclear forces in heavy, neutron-rich systems and motivate further refinement of many-body calculations to exploit absolute radii as stringent tests of the nuclear interaction.
Abstract
The angular distribution of the differential cross sections for proton elastic scattering from $^{132}$Sn at 196-210 MeV/nucleon was successfully measured over a momentum transfer range of 0.80 to 2.1 fm$^{-1}$. Using a relativistic impulse approximation, the root-mean-square matter radius of $^{132}$Sn was extracted to be $4.758^{+0.023}_{-0.024}$ fm, which was compared with the state-of-the-art ab initio calculations. Combined with the charge radius measured at ISOLDE, there are no theoretical calculations consistent with both matter and charge radii within the experimental errors.
