Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Detecting multilevel entanglement from light-based entanglement witnesses

Pedro Rosario, Romain Bachelard

Abstract

We introduce a set of electric-field based inequalities capable of detecting multilevel entanglement from a system of N quantum emitters. We determine that the polarization channel as well as the direction of detection can enhance entanglement detection, a feature specific to multilevel systems. We demonstrate the efficiency of the witnesses to detect genuine multipartite entanglement by applying it to families of paradigmatic quantum states, such as Dicke states, singlet states and W-like states. The detection is not only robust to noise, but also applies to mixed entangled states. Our findings open up possibilities for the detection of entanglement without local measurements in systems of multilevel emitters such as superconducting qubits, Rydberg atoms or quantum dots.

Detecting multilevel entanglement from light-based entanglement witnesses

Abstract

We introduce a set of electric-field based inequalities capable of detecting multilevel entanglement from a system of N quantum emitters. We determine that the polarization channel as well as the direction of detection can enhance entanglement detection, a feature specific to multilevel systems. We demonstrate the efficiency of the witnesses to detect genuine multipartite entanglement by applying it to families of paradigmatic quantum states, such as Dicke states, singlet states and W-like states. The detection is not only robust to noise, but also applies to mixed entangled states. Our findings open up possibilities for the detection of entanglement without local measurements in systems of multilevel emitters such as superconducting qubits, Rydberg atoms or quantum dots.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 72 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 11 sections, 72 equations, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Entanglement witness $W_{\vec{k}_{0}}$ for two three-level atoms prepared in the quantum state $\ket{\psi}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(\ket{11}+\ket{22}+\ket{13})$ with a relative distance between the emitters of $15/k_{0}$ along the $\hat{z}$ axis. The light emitted on both transitions is detected along three different channels of light polarization: (a)-(b) right circular $\hat{{e}}_{+}$ [case (i)], (c)-(d) left circular $\hat{{e}}_{-}$ [case (ii)], and (e)-(f) linear $\hat{e}_{z}$ [case (iii)]. It is collected in the direction $\hat{{R}}=(\sin\theta\cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,\cos\theta)$, with $0\leq \theta\leq \pi$ and $0\leq \phi \leq 2\pi$, which is here stereographically mapped to a plane. See main text for details on the dipole orientations.
  • Figure 2: Two three-level atoms prepared in the quantum state $\ket{\psi}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(\ket{11}+\ket{22}+\ket{13})$ with a relative distance between the emitters of $15/k_{0}$ along the $\hat{z}$ axis. Following the protocol described in Fig. \ref{['fig:1']}, the light is measured along the polarization channels (a) right circular and (b) left circular, which generates a symmetric mirror pattern for $W_{\vec{k}_{0}}$, as stated in Remark \ref{['remark:3']}. See main text for details on dipole configurations.

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2
  • Remark 3
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof
  • proof