Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Continuum model for the terahertz dielectric response of glasses

Tatsuya Mori, Hideyuki Mizuno, Dan Kyotani, Soo Han Oh, Yuzuki Motokawa, Yasuhiro Fujii, Akitoshi Koreeda, Shinji Kohara, Seiji Kojima

Abstract

Boson peak dynamics in glasses produce a robust crossover in the terahertz (THz) dielectric response that standard Debye or Lorentz models do not capture. We develop a continuum description of this THz response, coupling an infrared-effective charge fluctuation spectrum to a frequency-dependent shear modulus, and apply it to glycerol glass. The model reproduces the measured complex dielectric function and the nearly linear infrared light-vibration coupling around the boson peak, and highlights the dominant role of transverse shear dynamics.

Continuum model for the terahertz dielectric response of glasses

Abstract

Boson peak dynamics in glasses produce a robust crossover in the terahertz (THz) dielectric response that standard Debye or Lorentz models do not capture. We develop a continuum description of this THz response, coupling an infrared-effective charge fluctuation spectrum to a frequency-dependent shear modulus, and apply it to glycerol glass. The model reproduces the measured complex dielectric function and the nearly linear infrared light-vibration coupling around the boson peak, and highlights the dominant role of transverse shear dynamics.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 51 equations, 8 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 12 sections, 51 equations, 8 figures, 1 table.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Complex dielectric response of glycerol glass at $80~\mathrm{K}$. Symbols: THz-TDS measurements; solid curves: model. Plotted are $\varepsilon'(\omega)$ and $\varepsilon"(\omega)$ versus frequency (THz). The model reproduces the crossover from resonance-like behavior below $\omega_{\rm BP}$ to a broad Debye-like response above $\omega_{\rm BP}$. The weak convex-upward feature in $\varepsilon'(\omega)$ near $\omega_{\rm BP}$ is consistent with a shallow dip in $G'(\omega)$, i.e., a reduction of $V_{\rm TA}(\omega)=\sqrt{G'(\omega)/\rho}$ associated with the BP.
  • Figure 2: Reduced spectra and IR light-vibration coupling. (a) Reduced absorption $\alpha(\omega)/\omega^{2}$ (blue symbols) obtained from Fig. \ref{['fig:fig1']} via $\alpha(\omega)=\omega\varepsilon"(\omega)/(c\,n'(\omega))$ (with $c$ the speed of light and $n'(\omega)$ the real part of the refractive index), together with the reduced VDOS $g(\omega)/\omega^{2}$ (orange symbols) from independent inelastic neutron scattering (INS) Wuttke1995; solid lines are the model. (b) $C_{\rm IR}(\omega)=\alpha(\omega)/g(\omega)$. The near-linear dependence around the BP is captured by the model, whereas the quadratic Taraskin form $A+B\omega^{2}$ does not capture this trend. Vertical dashed lines mark the BP positions from IR and INS, $\omega_{\rm BP\text{-}IR}/2\pi \approx 1.40~\mathrm{THz}$ and $\omega_{\rm BP\text{-}INS}/2\pi \approx 1.00~\mathrm{THz}$, respectively. Here $\nu$ denotes the linear frequency, $\nu=\omega/2\pi$.
  • Figure 3: Static charge and density correlations in glycerol glass ($80~\mathrm{K}$). Shown are the charge--charge structure factor $S_{ZZ}(k)$ (blue) and the mass-density static structure factor $S_{\rho\rho}(k)$ (magenta) obtained from MD simulations. The FSDP and Debye wavenumbers ($k_{\rm FSDP}$, $k_{\rm D}$) are indicated. $S_{\rho\rho}(k)$ exhibits a pronounced FSDP at $k \sim 1.5~\text{\AA}^{-1}$, whereas $S_{ZZ}(k)$ has no FSDP maximum; instead its first (lowest-$k$) maximum appears only at higher $k$, on the interatomic-spacing scale.
  • Figure 4: Evolution with $R=q_{0}/(q_{2}k_{\rm D}^{2})$ in $\Delta q(k)=q_{0}+q_{2}k^{2}$: approaching the Taraskin-like regime. For each $R$, $q_0$ and $q_2$ are rescaled to keep $\int_{0}^{k_{\mathrm{D}}} \! dk\, k^{2}\lvert \Delta q(k)\rvert^{2}$ constant, isolating the effect of the $k$-independent term $q_0$ (see Supplemental Material SM). (a) Normalized $\Delta q(k)$ (scaled to unity at $k=k_{\rm D}$) plotted as a function of $k/k_{\rm D}$ for several $R$. (b) Normalized $C_{\rm IR}(\omega)$ (scaled to unity at $2.5~\mathrm{THz}$) computed with the same $G(\omega)$. Increasing $R$ strengthens the $k$-independent part of $\Delta q(k)$ and drives $C_{\mathrm{IR}}(\omega)$ from a nearly linear form (small $R$) toward the Taraskin-like behavior $C_{\mathrm{IR}}(\omega)\simeq A + B\omega^{2}$.
  • Figure S1: Transverse and longitudinal contributions to the modeled complex dielectric function. (a) Real part and (b) imaginary part. Red: transverse contribution $\varepsilon_T(\omega)$; blue: longitudinal contribution $\varepsilon_L(\omega)$; black: total $\varepsilon_T(\omega)+\varepsilon_L(\omega)=\varepsilon(\omega)-\varepsilon_\infty$. The functions $\varepsilon_T(\omega)$ and $\varepsilon_L(\omega)$ are defined in Eqs. (S35) and (S36).
  • ...and 3 more figures