QED Effects in PDFs -- A Les Houches Comparison Study
Thomas Cridge, Juan Cruz Martinez, Joey Huston
TL;DR
The paper addresses how including $QED$ in PDFs via the $LUXQED$ formalism affects parton luminosities and collider observables, focusing on the gluon–gluon channel. It benchmarks QCD+QED PDFs against QCD-only baselines at NNLO and approximate N3LO across CT18, MSHT20, and NNPDF4.0/3.1, highlighting how differences largely arise from $QED$ implementation and baseline choices. The main finding is that $gg$ luminosity shifts due to $QED$ are sub-percent, typically ranging from about $-0.6\%$ to $-1.6\%$ at NNLO and up to around $-1.9\%$ at aN3LO for some sets, with NNPDF4.0 often exhibiting the largest effects. Even after standardizing baselines and evolution settings, small residual differences remain, suggesting intrinsic PDF differences and reinforcing the case for cross-group benchmarking to faithfully propagate $QED$ uncertainties into precision Higgs cross sections.
Abstract
In the last decade, and even more so in the last few years, our knowledge of the internal structure of the proton has become more accurate and precise thanks to the large amount of data available and developments in theory and methodology. The reduction of the uncertainties associated to these developments has brought previously neglected effects into focus as their typical magnitude are competitive with the size of the uncertainties. One such effect is the inclusion of QED into PDF fits. Typically this is a percent effect, and thus while theoretically important, it has had a relatively limited impact on phenomenological studies up to this point. In this proceeding we study some of the effects which, while peripheral to the inclusion of QED in the proton, can considerably change the relative size and shape of the QCD+QED fit with respect to the QCD only determination. These may become important in the future as precision continues to increase. After a comparison of the QCD+QED PDFs with the QCD only PDFs of various global PDF fitting groups, we focus largely upon NNPDF4.0, which shows the biggest effect when including QED. Focusing largely on a single set of PDFs also enables more subtle effects to be analysed, making it an ideal candidate for this study.
